Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39550537›Full record

SynthesisBMC women's health2024

Comparative effectiveness of exercise interventions for primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Qingying Zheng, Guoyuan Huang, Wenjiao Cao, Ying Zhao

Abstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Physical agents' level in women with primary dysmenorrhea: A cross-sectional observational study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qingying ZhengDepartment of Physical Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Guoyuan HuangPott College of Science, Engineering and Education, University of Southern Indiana, Evansville, IN, USA.
Wenjiao CaoDepartment of gynaecology and obstetrics, International Peace Maternity & Child Health Hospital of China Welfare Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Ying ZhaoDepartment of Physical Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. zhao_ying@sjtu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China NO.82102669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExercise is increasingly being promoted as an effective treatment for primary dysmenorrhea (PD). This study aims to conduct a comprehensive network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials to identify the optimal types and dosages of exercise for managing PD in women.

methodsAdhering to PRISMA-NMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed RCTs from the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase databases up to May 23, 2024. Data analysis was performed using 'GEMTC' and 'BUGSnet' packages within a Bayesian framework in R and a hierarchy of exercise treatments was also calculated using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values. Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify the most effective exercise regimens, including duration, frequency, and volume of the exercise interventions.

resultsForty-nine studies representing 3,129 participants (1,640 exercises and 1,489 controls) were included. The results showed that all exercise interventions significantly reduced menstrual pain of the PD patients. Of six exercise intervention modalities based on the study ranked effectiveness, statistically significant reductions in pain intensity were found for resistance exercise and multi-component exercise. Multi-component exercise and stretching exercise were ranked best for menstrual symptoms, while core-strengthening exercise and multi-component exercise had the greatest impact on reducing pain duration. Significant and clinically important reductions or reliefs in pain occurred with 4 to 8 weeks of exercise training from all exercises, with resistance exercise showing the best efficacy when the duration exceeded 8 weeks, followed by multi-component exercise and mind-body exercise. Multi-component exercise and aerobic exercise with 1 to 3 sessions per week induced greater benefit in performance improvements, while resistance exercise with increased frequency showed the enhanced performance. Resistance exercise could elicit better efficacy within` 30-minute training duration, and multi-component exercise was ranked the best if such a training over 30 min.

conclusionThis study provided quantitative insight into efficacy and effectiveness of exercise interventions on PD treatments. All six different exercises are associated with positive influence on PD management. Our study indicates that this exercise training induced adaptation may have therapeutic benefits for PD patients; however, such alterations and improvements are affected by exercise regiments.

Indexed as

DysmenorrheaExercise TherapyExerciseFemaleHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeExerciseNetwork meta-analysisPrimary dysmenorrheaTherapeutic exercise

Identifiers

PMID39550537
PMCPMC11569607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.