ArticleScientific reports2024
Association of dietary niacin intake with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003-2018.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synergistic Actions of Natural Compounds for Enhancing Cognitive and Physical Performance: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Untargeted metabolomics approaches challenge the nutri-score FOPNL system in soluble cocoa products.NPJ science of food · 2025Article
- Cholesterol metabolism: molecular mechanisms, biological functions, diseases, and therapeutic targets.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Review
- Metabolomics in cardiometabolic diseases: Key biomarkers and therapeutic implications for insulin resistance and diabetes.Journal of internal medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The long-term health impacts of niacin are still debated, and the association between dietary niacin and mortality risk in populations hasn't been extensively explored. This study included 26,746 US adults aged 20 years or older from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2018, with a median follow-up of 9.17 years. During this period, there were 3,551 all-cause deaths, including 1,096 cardiovascular deaths. Cox models were used to compare hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality among participants grouped into different dietary niacin intake quartiles. Participants with the highest dietary niacin intake had a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.74, 95%CI 0.63-0.86) compared to those in the lowest intake quartile. For cardiovascular mortality, the HR was 0.73 (95%CI 0.57-0.95) in the highest niacin intake quartile. A dose-response relationship was revealed between dietary niacin intake and mortality by restricted cubic spline. Subgroup analysis showed a significant interaction between dietary niacin intake and diabetes concerning all-cause mortality (P = 0.046). In this population-based cohort study, higher dietary niacin intake correlates with lower risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among US adults. The influence of niacin intake on all-cause mortality appears to be more significant in non-diabetic individuals compared to those with diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.