ReviewBreast cancer research and treatment2025
Effects on lymph node size, staging and primary tumor histology on diagnostic accuracy of axillary lymph node aspirate of breast cancers.
Review in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of thyroiditis on the diagnostic performance of fine-needle aspiration cytology- clinico-radiologico-cytological analysis of risk factors for discordance.BMC endocrine disorders · 2026Article
- Deep Learning in Cytopathology: The Potential for Multimodal Synergy of Clinical and Cytological Input Data.Journal of cytologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFine-needle aspiration cytology is preferred for axillary lymph node metastasis with low costs and minimal risks. To improve diagnostic performance by incorporating clinical-radiological-pathological parameters, a large cohort pre-operative aspirates in were reviewed for parameters affecting adequacy rate and accuracy.
methodsAxillary nodal aspirates from three institutions with histologic correlation were retrieved. Case notes were reviewed for parameters pertaining to the primary tumor, nodal status, histologic and cytologic diagnoses.
resultsTotally 1361 specimens were included. The risk of malignancy for C1-C5 categories were 53.39%, 27.45%, 70.97%, 83.33% and 88.00%, increasing to 75.86%, 94.59% and 99.28% for C3/C4/C5 categories excluding cases with neoadjuvant therapy. Node size (p < 0.001) and histologic grade (p = 0.003) of primary tumor positively correlated with specimen adequacy. Presence of in situ component trended towards inadequacy (p = 0.069). Lymph node size remained a strong predictor of concordant cytologic diagnosis (p < 0.001). A higher percentage of involved node (p = 0.006) and HER2 overexpressed breast cancers (p = 0.027) increased concordance. Cases with ≥ 4 (up to ≥ 10) positive nodes were more likely to be concordant (p = 0.009- < 0.001), with improvements of 8.27%-12.37%. For size, cut-offs of ≥ 5 and ≥ 10 mm were significant (p = 0.006- < 0.001).
conclusionIt is critical that clinical-radiological-pathological findings be interpreted together with cytology. Aspirates from smaller nodes are more likely to be non-informative, irrespective of the total number of suspicious nodes, or a high-grade primary. In axillae with less than 4 suspicious nodes and/or a target node of less than 5-10 mm, the diagnostic accuracy of aspiration cytology decreases and should be interpreted cautiously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.