ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
The Long-Term Functional and Oncologic Outcomes of Kidney-Sparing Surgery in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trends in Treatment and Perioperative Outcomes of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: The Evolving Role of Lymphadenectomy and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of oncologic outcomes: kidney-sparing surgery versus radical nephroureterectomy for localized high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study investigated the utilization of kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) as an alternative option to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in managing upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients.
objectiveOur study aimed to compare the functional outcomes and oncological outcomes between KSS and RNU. MATERIAL AND
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 252 patients with UTUC without clinical node positivity or metastasis who had been treated with either RNU or KSS. We collected information on each patient, including clinicopathological factors, renal function variations, and oncological outcomes. Hemodialysis-free survival (HDFS), stage 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD4) progression-free survival (PFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-weighted Kaplan-Meier analysis. The hazard ratio for oncological and functional outcomes of KSS was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model.
resultsThe OS at 8 years was 77.06% (RNU) and 70.59% (KSS) and did not significantly differ between the two groups (p = 0.691), although the KSS group experienced a higher recurrence rate. Functional outcomes indicated no significant difference in postoperative renal function at 1 year; however, KSS was associated with better preservation of renal function (23.44% vs. 28.23%), albeit not statistically significant (p = 0.055). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant disparities in CKD4 PFS between the KSS and RNU groups involved in the study (p = 0.089), although the KSS group displayed poorer HDFS than the RNU group (p = 0.001).
conclusionKSS had no compromising survival outcomes when compared with RNU, not only in low-risk patients but also in high-risk patients with a normal contralateral kidney. The efficacy of renal function preservation was presented in this study, however the results were below our expectations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.