ArticleEye (London, England)2025
Association of macular microcirculation with renal function in Chinese non-diabetic patients with hypertension.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigation of the association between retinal microcirculation and renal function in children with lupus nephritis.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- The retina-body axis: proteomic mechanisms linking oculomics and clinical traits in a female aging cohort.npj aging · 2026Article
- Divergent nasal-temporal changes in superficial vascular density as early biomarkers of diabetic retinopathy.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to investigate the association of macular microcirculation with renal function and the feasibility of using macular microcirculatory parameters to monitor renal function in Chinese non-diabetic patients with hypertension.
methodsThis case-control study included 62 non-diabetic patients with hypertension, including 31 with renal dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <90 mL/min/1.73 m
resultsIn comparison with the patients with normal renal function, patients with renal dysfunction had lower macular superficial parafovea vessel density (18.6 vs. 19.4%, P = 0.029), macular cube average thickness (273.0 vs. 280.2 µm, P = 0.003), and average ganglion cell layer and inner plexiform layer (GCL-IPL) thickness (79.5 vs. 82.8 µm, P = 0.006), but similar macular central fovea vessel density and central fovea thickness (P ≥ 0.54). After adjustment for confounders, eGFR was significantly associated with macular superficial parafovea vessel density, cube average thickness and GCL-IPL thickness (P < 0.02). In detecting renal dysfunction, areas under the curve were 0.61, 0.66 and 0.65 for macular superficial parafovea vessel density, cube average thickness and GCL-IPL thickness.
conclusionIn non-diabetic patients with hypertension, macular superficial parafovea vessel density, cube average thickness and GCL-IPL thickness were significantly worse in patients with renal dysfunction than those with normal renal function. Using macular parameters to monitor renal function is feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.