ArticleJournal of human hypertension2025
High blood pressure in the emergency department as an opportunistic screening tool for detection of hypertension.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Elevated Blood Pressure on Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Outcomes in Older Adults: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- High Blood Pressure Among Emergency Department Patients: Effects of Educational Intervention.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hypertension is the most preventable cause of morbidity and mortality, but many individuals are underdiagnosed and lack treatment control. High blood pressure (BP) in the emergency department (ED) is commonly observed, but mostly used for short-term evaluation. We aimed to study the usefulness of high BP in the ED as a screening tool for undiagnosed hypertension. We used the electronic medical record system to identify all patients that had attended the ED at a university hospital from 2018-01-01 to 2018-03-31 and from 2018-07-01 to 2018-09-30 with an obtained systolic BP ≥ 160 and/or diastolic BP ≥ 100 mmHg measured at the ED. We excluded patients with previously diagnosed hypertension and patients on BP-lowering medication. All patients identified where contacted two years after attending the ED, with a letter of consent and a questionnaire regarding diagnosis of hypertension and current medication. 5424 patients attended the ED during the 6-months-period. 271 patients met the inclusion criteria and were asked to participate. 167 individuals (62%) agreed to participate and responded to the questionnaire. Mean age of participants were 63.1 years and 51% were women. 134 patients (80%) had measured their BP after the ED-visit, and 48 (36%) of those had been diagnosed with hypertension. 96% of patients diagnosed with hypertension were on BP-lowering medication. To follow-up BP ≥ 160/100 mmHg after an ED visit can reveal undiagnosed hypertension in one third of the patients. Given the amount of undiagnosed hypertension, an ED-measured BP might provide an important tool to detect and start treatment of hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.