ArticleScientific reports2024
Predicting the compressive strength of high-performance concrete using an interpretable machine learning model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Concrete strength prediction using domain-driven feature engineering and explainable LightGBM.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Compressive strength prediction of coconut fiber reinforced concrete using PSO optimized explainable machine learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prediction of Chloride Penetration Depth in Concrete Using a Combined Ensemble-Neural Network Architecture: Facing Data Saturation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Nondestructive Detection of Eggshell Thickness Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Based on GBDT Feature Selection and an Improved CatBoost Algorithm.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluating the predictive accuracy of supervised machine learning models to explore the mechanical strength of blast furnace slag incorporated concrete.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Predicting compressive strength of mortars containing recycled CRT glass using GMDH and GEP methods.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Experimental and machine learning prediction of compressive strength of chemically activated RHA based RAC using SHAP and PDP analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Sustainable Concrete with Waste Tire Rubber and Recycled Steel Fibers: Experimental Insights and Hybrid PINN-CatBoost Prediction.Polymers · 2025Article
- Intelligent low carbon reinforced concrete beam design optimization via deep reinforcement learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Prediction of Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete Using Different Homogenization Methods.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of daily global solar radiation prediction using deep learning models inputted with stochastic variables.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reliable predictions of concrete strength can reduce construction time and labor costs, providing strong support for building construction quality inspection. To enhance the accuracy of concrete strength prediction, this paper introduces an interpretable framework for machine learning (ML) models to predict the compressive strength of high-performance concrete (HPC). By leveraging information from a concrete dataset, an additional six features were added as inputs in the training process of the random forest (RF), AdaBoost, XGBoost and LightGBM models, and the optimal hyperparameters of the models were determined using 5-fold cross-validation and random search methods. Four interpretable ML models for predicting the compressive strength of HPC, including the RF, AdaBoost, XGBoost and LightGBM models, which combine feature derivation and random search, were constructed. In addition, the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was applied to analyze the effects of the input features on the prediction results of the LightGBM model, which combines feature derivation and random search. The results showed that input features such as age, water/cement ratio, slag, and water were the key influences for predicting the compressive strength of HPC. Input features such as the superplastic/cement ratio, slag/cement ratio, and ash/cement ratio had nonsignificant impacts on the predicted compressive strength.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.