ArticleScientific reports2024
Evaluation of a compact cone beam CT concept with high image fidelity for point-of-care brain imaging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the effects of menopause on the quality and quantity of intraoral autogenous block graft donor sites using cone-beam computed tomography.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Investigation of 2D anti-scatter grid implementation in a gantry-mounted cone beam computed tomography system for proton therapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has potential advantages for developing portable, cost-effective point-of-care CT systems for intracranial imaging, such as early stroke diagnosis, hemorrhage detection, and intraoperative navigation. However, large volume imaging with flat panel detector based CBCT significantly increases the scattered radiation fluence which reduces its image quality and utility. To address these issues, a compact CBCT concept with enhanced image quality was investigated for intracranial imaging. The new system features a novel antiscatter collimator and data correction method to address the challenges in imaging large volumes with CBCT. A benchtop CBCT prototype was constructed. Imaging studies with anthropomorphic phantoms showed that soft tissue visualization, Hounsfield Unit (HU) accuracy, contrast, and spatial resolution increased significantly with the proposed CBCT concept, and they were comparable to the values measured in the gold standard multidetector-row CT (MDCT) images. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in CBCT images was within 12-31% of the CNR in MDCT images. These findings indicate that a compact CBCT system integrated with effective scatter suppression techniques may have increased utility in the context of brain imaging, and the proposed approach may enable the development of point-of-care CT systems for head imaging based on flat panel detector based CBCT technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.