ArticleScientific reports2024
Analysis of components and related risk factors of urinary stones: a retrospective study of 1055 patients in southern China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A study on metabolic differences between infectious and non-infectious stones in patients with urine culture positive for Proteus mirabilis.BMC urology · 2026Article
- Unravelling the Added Value of Urinary Stone Cultures Towards Infectious Complications Following Treatment of Renal Stones.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multi-target litholytic strategy toward calcium oxalate stone therapy: a fundamental study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Article
- Extraplanar ultrasound-guided multi-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective comparative study in patients with complex nephrolithiasis.Frontiers in urology · 2026Article
- Article
- M2 Macrophages Attenuate AQP2Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Noninvasive CT radiomics-clinical model accurately classifies anhydrous uric acid stones: a multicenter study.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Correlation Between Stone Composition and Serum Metabolic Abnormalities in Recurrent Renal Calculi.Cureus · 2025Article
- Characterization of the gut microbiota in urinary calculi patients with preoperative urinary tract infection.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- BMI mediates the association between red cell distribution width to serum albumin index and kidney stone risk: a population-based study.Therapeutic advances in urologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We conducted a retrospective study of 1055 patients with urinary stones who attended our single center from September 2017 to June 2024. Clinical data and laboratory indicators of patients were evaluated and compared with stone components. The most common type in our study was calcium oxalate (CaOx) stones (76.6%), followed by infection stones (13.2%) and uric acid (UA) stones (7.8%). Among the 1055 specimens, 899 (85.2%) cases were mixed component stones, of which calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) and calcium oxalate dihydrate (COD) mixture were the most frequent (34.8%). There were only 156 cases (14.8%) of pure-component stones, of which anhydrous UA was the most frequent (7.0%). There were 738 males and 317 females, with a male-to-female ratio of 2.33:1. Male dominance was evident in CaOx stones (79.0 vs. 71.0%, P = 0.005). Female dominance was noted in infection stones (21.1 vs. 9.8%, P < 0.001). The multivariate analysis showed that higher serum albumin level was a risk factor for CaOx stone formation (OR = 2.959; 95% CI 1.470-5.953, P = 0.002). Women were more likely to develop infection stones than men (OR = 1.796; 95% CI 1.150-2.803, P = 0.010). As the urine pH increased, the risk of infection stones formation increased (OR = 2.521; 95% CI 1.809-3.513, P < 0.001). Moreover, a history of hypertension (OR = 2.339; 95% CI 1.409-3.881, P = 0.001), low urine pH (OR = 0.242; 95% CI 0.147-0.399, P < 0.001), and low serum albumin level (OR = 0.351; 95% CI 0.125-0.988, P = 0.047) were risk factors for the formation of UA stones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.