ArticleScientific reports2024
Impact of molecular configuration on the photoluminescence and electrical characteristics of poly-pyrrol-thiazol-imine polymers films.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural dyes of mulberry leaf enriched with carbon dots as greener methodology to improve the optical properties of chitosan biopolymer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Eco-friendly fabrication of flag blue flower-derived CQD-doped chitosan films with tunable optical and photoluminescent properties.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The optical, photoluminescence, and electrical properties of Poly(Z)-PTI and Poly(E)-PTI, two Poly-Pyrrol-Thiazol-Imine polymers with comparable chemical structures but distinct configurations, were examined. Using the dip-casting method, polymer films were deposited on ITO substrates. UV-VIS spectroscopy revealed that both polymers diverged between 500 and 800 nm, showing the impact of molecular arrangement, but showed similar absorption behavior for wavelengths shorter than 500 nm. For Poly(Z)-PTI, the direct optical energy gaps were 2.06 eV, while for Poly(E)-PTI, they were 1.78 eV. Poly(Z)-PTI displayed an emission peak at 610 nm (red) according to laser photoluminescence spectra, while Poly(E)-PTI peaked at 563 nm (green-yellow). The capacitance behavior was revealed by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Nyquist plots suggested an equivalent circuit model of R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.