ArticleScientific reports2024
Impact of tooth loss and patient characteristics on coronary artery calcium score classification and prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of an Oral Health Index and Its Association with Oral Health-Related Quality of Life and Cardiovascular Risks: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Observational
- Tooth Loss as a Predictor of Coronary Artery Disease Severity in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Stomatognathic Diseases Reveal Bidirectional Link Between Diabetes Mellitus and Coronary Artery Calcium: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Multi-Way Array Analysis.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Dental Disease as a Clinical Marker for Coronary Artery Disease Severity: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Mechanisms.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study, for the first time, explores the integration of data science and machine learning for the classification and prediction of coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores. It focuses on tooth loss and patient characteristics as key input features to enhance the accuracy of classifying CAC scores into tertiles and predicting their values. Advanced analytical techniques were employed to assess the effectiveness of tooth loss and patient characteristics in the classification and prediction of CAC scores. The study utilized data science and machine learning methodologies to analyze the relationships between these input features and CAC scores. The research evaluated the individual and combined contributions of patient characteristics and tooth loss on the accuracy of identifying individuals at higher risk of cardiovascular issues related to CAC. The findings indicated that patient characteristics were particularly effective for tertile classification of CAC scores, achieving a classification accuracy of 75%. Tooth loss alone provided more accurate predicted CAC scores with the smallest average mean squared error of regression and with a classification accuracy of 71%. The combination of patient characteristics and tooth loss demonstrated improved accuracy in identifying individuals at higher risk with the best sensitivity rate of 92% over patient characteristics (85%) and tooth loss (88%). The results highlight the significance of both oral health indicators and patient characteristics in predictive modeling and classification tasks for CAC scores. By integrating data science and machine learning techniques, the research provides a foundation for further exploration of the connections between oral health, patient characteristics, and cardiovascular outcomes, emphasizing their importance in advancing the accuracy of CAC score classification and prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.