ArticleScientific reports2024
Discussion on the calculation formula of haemoglobin glycation index for Chinese population.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The association between speech impairments and depression in Chinese adults aged 45 and older: insights from the CHARLS database.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To explore the formula for calculating the haemoglobin glycation index (HGI) in an appropriate Chinese population. Evaluating the applicability of the HGI calculation formula proposed by Hempe et al. in the Chinese population; according to the data from CHARLS 2011, 10,587 self-reported nondiabetics aged 20 years and older were selected as the study subjects, regression equations were constructed to fit the linear relationship between HbA1c and FPG in the population, and the profile characteristics of the resultant population were analysed. The standardized HGI formula put forth by Hempe and colleagues has been found unsuitable for application to the Chinese population. Leveraging CHARLS dataset, we derive a novel HGI calculation formula tailored to the Chinese demographic: HGI = Measured HbA1c-Predicted HbA1c, where Predicted HbA1c = 0.011×FPG + 4.032. We found statistically significant differences in HGI among obese individuals; those with higher waist circumference, total cholesterol levels, LDL levels, diastolic blood pressure and those with lower HDL levels. The HGI calculation formula proposed using CHARLS data is more applicable to the Chinese population and can be used as a standardised HGI to Chinese.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.