ArticleScientific reports2024
Taxonomy and phylogeny of rodents parasitic fleas in southeastern China with description of a new subspecies of Ctenophthalmus breviprojiciens.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Xenopsylla buxtoni fleas as a dominant species harboring multiple infections of Wolbachia lineages in the ancient plague epicenters of Iran.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Infestation patterns and ecological distribution of fleas and sucking lice onVeterinary world · 2026Article
- New mitogenomic evidence for the phylogeny of Siphonaptera: insights fromFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Mitochondrial genomes of two subspecies ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- The first complete mitochondrial genome sequences ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Infestation and Distribution of Ectoparasitic Insects on the White-Footed Indochinese Rat (Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- The complete mitochondrial genomes ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate differentiation and identification of flea species are essential for both basic and applied research on fleas, as well as for the diagnosis of flea-borne diseases. However, distinguishing between flea species can be challenging, especially among those with minimal morphological differences. Therefore, some scholars have suggested the necessity of comprehensive revisions to the classification of fleas, incorporating morphological, molecular, and phylogenetic data. In this study, we focused on classifying the rodents' parasitic fleas in southeastern China and provided molecular and phylogenetic data. We also described a new subspecies Ctenophthalmus breviprojiciens fujiansis n. ssp. A total of 392 fleas were collected from 8 species of rodents in 10 counties. Morphologically, they belonged to 10 species, 9 genera and 5 families. Barcode identification based on COI gene and phylogenetic analysis based on five genetic markers (18S rDNA, 28S rDNA, EF-1a, COI, COII) revealed that the molecular and morphological identification of Xenopsylla cheopis, Aviostivalius klossi bispiniformis, Leptopsylla segnis, Monopsyllus anisus and Ctenocephalides felis felis were consistent. The taxonomic status of Neopsylla specialis minpiensis and Peromyscopsylla himalaica sinica as subspecies is questionable due to significant intraspecific genetic distance, and further morphological and molecular data are required to determine if they should be elevated to species level. The molecular identification of C. breviprojiciens n. ssp., N. dispar fukienensis, and Nosopsyllus nicanus could not be completed at this time due to a lack of sequences for related species in existing GenBank databases. Additionally, phylogenetic relationships of 31 species from 9 genera and 5 families of Siphonaptera were inferred based on five molecular markers (18S rDNA, 28S rDNA, EF-1a, COI and COII) using Maximum Likelihood analyses. The analyses revealed that various taxa of Siphonaptera are monophyletic at the subspecies, species, and genus levels. However, at the family level, Leptopsyllidae, Ceratophyllidae, Pulicidae, and Pygiopsyllidae are all monophyletic, while Ctenophthalmidae is paraphyletic. we support the view of some authors that revising the catchall group Ctenophthalmidae and elevating each of its constituent subfamilies to family status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.