Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39550385›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Biological control of nosemosis in Apis mellifera L. with Acacia nilotica extract.

Ashraf S A El-Sayed, Nahla A M Fathy, Mai Labib, Ashraf F El-Baz, Aly A El-Sheikh, Ahmed H Moustafa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ashraf S A El-SayedEnzymology and Fungal Biotechnology Lab (EFBL), Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt. ash.elsayed@gmail.com.
Nahla A M FathyEnzymology and Fungal Biotechnology Lab (EFBL), Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt.
Mai LabibAgriculture Genetic Engineering Research Institute (AGERI), Agricultural Research Center, Giza, 12619, Egypt.
Ashraf F El-BazGenetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute, University of Sadat City, Sadat City, 22857/79, Egypt.
Aly A El-SheikhPlant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.
Ahmed H MoustafaChemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nosemosis is one of the most devastating diseases of Apis mellifera (Honey bees) caused by the single-celled spore-forming fungi Nosema apis, N. ceranae and N. neumanii, causing a severe loss on the colony vitality and productivity. Fumagillin, a MetAP2 inhibitor, was a certified treatment for controlling nosemosis, nevertheless, due to its deleterious effects on honey bees and humans, it is prohibited. So, searching for novel biological agents with affordable selectivity to target Nosema species infecting Apis mellifera, with nil toxicity to bees and humans is the main objective of this study. Nosema species were isolated from naturally infected honey bees. The methanolic extracts of Acacia nilotica, Elaeis guineensis, and Catharanthus roseus were tested to selectively control the growth of Nosema spp of honeybees. The spores of Nosema species were molecularly and morphologically identified. Among the tested plant extracts, the methanolic extracts (0.1%) of A. nilotica had the most activity towards Nosema spp causing about 37.8 and 32.5% reduction in the spores' load at 5- and 9-days post-infection, respectively, compared to the untreated control. At 0.1%, the A. nilotica methanolic extract exhibited the highest inhibitory effect for Nosema spores, without any obvious bee mortality. Catharanthus roseus displayed a reduction of spores by 27.02%, with bee mortality rate of 27.02%. At 1% for 5 dpi, the A. nilotica extracts led to 18.18% bee mortality, while the C. roseus extracts resulted in 100% mortality, as revealed from the toxicity and quantification bioassays. So, the extracts of A. nilotica and C. roseus had a significant effect in controlling the N. apis and N. ceranae titer compared to the infected untreated control at both time points. The titer of N. apis and N. ceranae was noticeably decreased by more than 80% and 90%, in response to A. nilotica, compared to the control. From the metabolic profiling by GC-MS analysis, the most frequent active compounds of A. nilotica were 2,4,6-trihy-droxybenzoic acid, 1,2-dihydroxybenzene, myristic acid, and linoleic acid. These compounds were analyzed in silico to assess their binding affinity to the ATP binding protein, methionine aminopeptidase and polar tube protein of Nosema species as target enzymes. The compound 2,4,6-trihydroxybenzoic acid had the lowest energy to bind with ATP binding protein, methionine aminopeptidase and polar tube protein of Nosema, followed by 1,2-dihydroxybenzene and myristic acid, compared to fumagilin. So, from the experimental and molecular docking analysis, the extracts of A. nilotica had the highest activity to attack the cellular growth machinery of Nosema species without an obvious effect to the honeybees, ensuring their prospective promising application.

Indexed as

AcaciaNosemaPlant ExtractsAnimalsBeesBiological Control AgentsSpores, FungalBiological Control AgentsPlant ExtractsAcacia niloticaApis melliferaCatharanthus roseusGC–MS analysisHoneybeesNosema sppNosemosis

Identifiers

PMID39550385
PMCPMC11569257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.