Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39550384›Full record

ArticleScientific data2024

Future land use maps for the Netherlands based on the Dutch One Health Shared Socio-economic Pathways.

Martha Dellar, Gertjan Geerling, Kasper Kok, Peter M van Bodegom, Gerard van der Schrier, Maarten Schrama, Eline Boelee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Martha DellarInstitute of Environmental Sciences, University of Leiden, Van Steenis Building, Einsteinweg 2, 2333CC, Leiden, The Netherlands. martha.dellar@deltares.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1044-4265
Gertjan GeerlingDeltares, Daltonlaan 600, 3584BK, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Kasper KokEnvironmental Systems Analysis, Wageningen University, P.O.Box 47, 6700AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Peter M van BodegomInstitute of Environmental Sciences, University of Leiden, Van Steenis Building, Einsteinweg 2, 2333CC, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0771-4500
Gerard van der SchrierRoyal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, Utrechtseweg 297, 3731GA, De Bilt, The Netherlands.
Maarten SchramaInstitute of Environmental Sciences, University of Leiden, Van Steenis Building, Einsteinweg 2, 2333CC, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9803-6244
Eline BoeleeDeltares, Daltonlaan 600, 3584BK, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research) NWA.1160.1S.210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To enable detailed study of a wide variety of future health challenges, we have created future land use maps for the Netherlands for 2050, based on the Dutch One Health Shared Socio-economic Pathways (SSPs). This was done using the DynaCLUE modelling framework. Future land use is based on altitude, soil properties, groundwater, salinity, flood risk, agricultural land price, distance to transport hubs and climate. We also account for anticipated demand for different land use types, historic land use changes and potential spatial restrictions. These land use maps can be used to model many different health risks to people, animals and the environment, such as disease, water quality and pollution. In addition, the Netherlands can serve as an example for other rapidly urbanising deltas where many of the health risks will be similar.

Identifiers

PMID39550384
PMCPMC11569152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.