Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39549702›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2024

Monkeys engage in visual simulation to solve complex problems.

Aarit Ahuja, Nadira Yusif Rodriguez, Alekh Karkada Ashok, Thomas Serre, Theresa M Desrochers, David L Sheinberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aarit AhujaDepartment of Neuroscience, Brown University, Meeting Street, Providence, RI 02906, USA; Exponent, Worcester Street, Natick, MA 01760, USA.
Nadira Yusif RodriguezDepartment of Neuroscience, Brown University, Meeting Street, Providence, RI 02906, USA.
Alekh Karkada AshokDepartment of Cognitive and Psychological Science, Brown University, Thayer Street, Providence, RI 02906, USA.
Thomas SerreDepartment of Cognitive and Psychological Science, Brown University, Thayer Street, Providence, RI 02906, USA; Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Sciences, Brown University, Angell Street, Providence, RI 02906, USA.
Theresa M DesrochersDepartment of Neuroscience, Brown University, Meeting Street, Providence, RI 02906, USA; Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Sciences, Brown University, Angell Street, Providence, RI 02906, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University, Providence, RI 02906, USA.
David L SheinbergDepartment of Neuroscience, Brown University, Meeting Street, Providence, RI 02906, USA; Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Sciences, Brown University, Angell Street, Providence, RI 02906, USA. Electronic address: david_sheinberg@brown.edu.

Funding

Interdisciplinary Predoctoral Neuroscience Training Program in the Neuroscience Graduate Program.T32MH020068 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI LIPSCOMBE, DIANE, SHEINBERG, DAVID L · 1999 to 2025
$7.6M
Dynamic Visual Activity in Temporal CortexR01EY014681 · NEI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI SHEINBERG, DAVID L · 2004 to 2017
$3.7M
Interdisciplinary Vision Training ProgramT32EY018080 · NEI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI PARADISO, MICHAEL A · 2007 to 2021
$1.9M
Training Program for Interactionist Cognitive Neuroscience (ICoN)T32MH115895 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL J. FRANK, STEPHANIE Ruggiano JONES · 2019 to 2026
$1.8M
Toward an animal model of visual simulationR21EY032713 · NEI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI SHEINBERG, DAVID L · 2021 to 2022
$420k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014681NEI NIH HHS R21 EY032713NEI NIH HHS T32 EY018080NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020068NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH115895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual simulation-i.e., using internal reconstructions of the world to experience potential future versions of events that are not currently happening-is among the most sophisticated capacities of the human mind. But is this ability in fact uniquely human? To answer this question, we tested monkeys on a series of experiments involving the "Planko" game, which we have previously used to evoke visual simulation in human participants. We found that monkeys were able to successfully play the game using a simulation strategy, predicting the trajectory of a ball through a field of planks while demonstrating a level of accuracy and behavioral signatures comparable with those of humans. Computational analyses further revealed that the monkeys' strategy while playing Planko aligned with a recurrent neural network (RNN) that approached the task using a spontaneously learned simulation strategy. Finally, we carried out awake functional magnetic resonance imaging while monkeys played Planko. We found activity in motion-sensitive regions of the monkey brain during hypothesized simulation periods, even without any perceived visual motion cues. This neural result closely mirrors previous findings from human research, suggesting a shared mechanism of visual simulation across species. Taken together, these findings challenge traditional views of animal cognition, proposing that nonhuman primates possess a complex cognitive landscape, capable of invoking imaginative and predictive mental experiences to solve complex everyday problems.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAnimalsBrainCognitionMacaca mulattaMaleMotion PerceptionProblem SolvingVisual Perceptioneye MovementsfMRIimaginationintuitive physicsmacaqueneural networksneurosciencesimulationvision

Identifiers

PMID39549702
PMCPMC11652241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.