Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39549555›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2024

A data integration method for new advances in development cognitive neuroscience.

Kelsey L Canada, Tracy Riggins, Simona Ghetti, Noa Ofen, Ana M Daugherty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kelsey L CanadaInstitute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA. Electronic address: kcanada@wayne.edu.
Tracy RigginsDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Simona GhettiDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA; Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Noa OfenInstitute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA; Center for Vital Longevity, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Psychology, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.
Ana M DaughertyInstitute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA; Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA; Michigan Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: ana.daugherty@wayne.edu.

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG072931 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Scott ROBERTS · 2021 to 2026
$26.5M
DEVELOPMENT OF MEMORY NETWORKS IN CHILDRENR01MH107512 · NIMH · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Noa Ofen · 2016 to 2026
$5.0M
NEURAL CORRELATES OF AGE-RELATED DIFFERENCES IN MEMORYR01AG011230 · NIA · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DAUGHERTY, ANA MARIE, RAZ, NAFTALI · 1993 to 2020
$4.8M
Role of the Hippocampus and its Projections in Episodic Memory DevelopmentR01MH091109 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BUNGE, SILVIA A., GHETTI, SIMONA · 2011 to 2015
$2.7M
Hippocampal-Memory Network Development and Episodic Memory in Early ChildhoodR01HD079518 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI RIGGINS, TRACY L. · 2014 to 2018
$1.5M
An integrative multisite study of the influence of socioeconomic disparities on hippocampal subfields developmental trajectoriesF32HD108960 · NICHD · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CANADA, KELSEY LEIGH · 2022 to 2024
$224k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072931NIA NIH HHS R01 AG011230NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD108960NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD079518NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH091109NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combining existing datasets to investigate key questions in developmental cognitive neuroscience brings exciting opportunities and unique challenges. However, many data pooling methods require identical or harmonized methodologies that are often not feasible. We propose Integrative Data Analysis (IDA) as a promising framework to advance developmental cognitive neuroscience with secondary data analysis. IDA serves to test hypotheses by combining data of the same construct from commensurate (but not identical) measures. To overcome idiosyncrasies of neuroimaging data, IDA explicitly evaluates if measures across studies assess the same construct. Moreover, IDA allows investigators to examine meaningful individual variability by de-confounding source-specific differences. To demonstrate IDA's potential, we explain foundational concepts, outline necessary steps, and apply IDA to volumetric measures of hippocampal subfields from 443 4- to 17-year-olds across three independent studies. We identified commensurate measures of Cornu Ammonis (CA) 1, dentate gyrus (DG)/CA3, and Subiculum (Sub). Model testing supported use of IDA to create IDA factor scores. We found age-related differences in DG/CA3, not but CA1 and Sub volume in the integrated dataset. By successfully demonstrating IDA, our hope is that future innovations come from the combination of existing neuroimaging data to create representative integrated samples when testing critical developmental questions.

Indexed as

Cognitive NeuroscienceHippocampusAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolData AnalysisFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuroimagingDevelopmentHippocampal subfieldsIntegrative data analysisNeuroimagingSecondary data analysis

Identifiers

PMID39549555
PMCPMC11609474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.