SynthesisCarcinogenesis2025
Prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in different cancer types detected by ultra-low-pass whole-genome sequencing: a systematic review and patient-level survival data meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Carcinogenesis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modelled impact of a multi-cancer early detection screening programme on cancer treatment in England.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Liquid Biopsy in Advanced Prostate Cancer.Cancers · 2026Review
- The Transformative Potential of Liquid Biopsies and Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) in Modern Oncology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Ultra-low-pass whole-genome sequencing of bile cfDNA in patients with biliary strictures.eGastroenterology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a circulating tumor DNA-based machine learning model for predicting immunotherapy response in non-small cell lung cancer.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Identification of CAV1 and CDH5 as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in lung adenocarcinoma.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2025Article
- ctDNA in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Critical Appraisal.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultra-low-pass whole-genome sequencing (ULP-WGS) (≤0.5 × coverage) of plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has emerged as a low-cost, promising tool to assess the circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) fraction. This meta-analysis aims to summarize the current findings and comprehensively investigate the prognostic value of baseline ctDNA detected by ULP-WGS in solid tumors. A systematic review was carried out by searching PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases to identify eligible studies conducted between January 2014 and January 2024. Inclusion criteria comprised studies with reported overall survival and progression-free survival outcomes across therapy-naïve patients with different solid tumors. All patients underwent baseline ULP-WGS of plasma cfDNA and were categorized as ctDNA positive (tumor fraction ≥10%) or negative (tumor fraction <10%). A one-stage meta-analysis was performed using patient-level survival data reconstructed from published articles. A Cox proportional hazards model with shared frailty was used to assess the difference in survival between arms. A total of six studies, comprising 620 patients (367 negative ctDNA and 253 positive ctDNA), were included in the overall survival analysis, while five studies, involving 349 patients (212 negative ctDNA and 137 positive ctDNA), were included in the progression-free survival analysis. The meta-analysis showed that patients with baseline positive ctDNA had a significantly higher risk of death (HR = 2.60, 95% CI: 2.01-3.36) and disease progression (HR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.71-3.05) compared to those with negative ctDNA. The presence of a positive ctDNA at baseline is associated with increased risk of death and progression in patients with same-stage cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.