ArticleJournal of community genetics2024
Key challenges in developing a gene therapy for Usher syndrome: machine-assisted scoping review.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Why advanced therapy medicinal products struggle in clinical translation: an in-depth analysis of developmental challenges in the EU.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite compelling empirical evidence demonstrating its efficacy, gene therapies for usher syndrome (USH) are not yet available for the patient's usage. This scoping review assessed the current scenario and analysed the challenges in implementing gene therapies for USH. A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar through an artificial intelligence (AI) tool, MaiA, focusing on relevant publications from the last 10 years. We followed the methodological guidance of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. Of 517 records, 51 reports were considered for final analysis. It identified and categorized challenges across four key areas: preclinical, clinical, economic, and regulatory. Of all, many reports (30) highlighted the preclinical challenges where the USH gene development process encountered roadblocks. Specifically, preclinical challenges included the lack of suitable in-vivo models and effective delivery methods. Clinical challenges focused on establishing clear endpoints and long-term safety and efficacy. Economic challenges addressed diagnostic issues and manufacturing hurdles, while regulatory challenges focused on expedited evaluation processes and guidance for clinical development. Our analysis uncovered key barriers to clinical translation of USH gene therapy and strategies to address them. Researchers are employing innovative approaches, including novel delivery methods such as minigenes and nanoparticles, inventive clinical trial designs, cohesive regulatory frameworks, strategic market assessments, and collaborative research initiatives. These efforts hold promise for impactful disease-cure and modifying interventions ultimately enhancing the quality of life for USH patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.