ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2025
Out-of-hospital onset versus in-hospital onset for clinical outcomes in spontaneous intramuscular hematoma diagnosed by computed tomography: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aging global population and the increasing use of antithrombotic agents have made spontaneous intramuscular hematomas (SIH) a growing concern. The association between the settings of SIH onset and clinical outcomes remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine these associations. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in Hiroshima, Japan between January 2008 and January 2022. We included consecutive patients aged ≥ 15 years with SIH at any site diagnosed by computed tomography. The subjects were divided into two groups according to onset settings: out-of-hospital onset and in-hospital onset. The main outcome was treatment failure (composite of change in initial treatment and in-hospital death), and in-hospital mortality was also assessed. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to estimate the causal effects of onset settings on outcomes. Of 84 included subjects with SIH, 63 had out-of-hospital onset and 21 had in-hospital onset. One subject (1.6%) with out-of-hospital onset and four subjects (19%) with in-hospital onset experienced treatment failure. In the IPTW cohort, in-hospital onset was associated with treatment failure [odds ratio (OR) 29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.2-270]. In addition, one subject (1.6%) with out-of-hospital onset and three subjects (14%) with in-hospital onset died during hospitalization. In-hospital onset was associated with a high rate of in-hospital mortality (OR 25, 95% CI 6.3-240) in the IPTW cohort. SIH with in-hospital onset had a poorer prognosis than that of SIH with out-of-hospital onset, suggesting that onset setting might be a novel predictor of clinical outcomes for SIH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39549171What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.