ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025
Factors associated with breast cancer detection method in California women: an analysis of California Health Interview Survey data.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBreast cancer mortality has significantly declined in the U.S. due in part to effective clinical screening methods. However, previous studies have found many women first detect their breast cancers through means other than their providers. Given that detection method has been shown to be an important prognostic factor, we examined the association between breast cancer detection method and various demographic and health-related factors in a representative sample of female breast cancer patients aged 40 + in California.
methodsWe analyzed data from the 2009 and 2011-2012 California Health Interview Survey. Weighted percentages of breast cancer patients by detection method were calculated. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to quantify each factor's association with the likelihood of having a patient-detected versus clinically detected breast cancer using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
results36% of female breast cancer patients first detected their cancer themselves. Compared to U.S.-born women, those who had spent 40% or less of their lifetime in the U.S. were more than twice as likely to report their breast cancer being patient-detected versus clinically detected (OR = 2.27, 95% CI 1.06-4.86, p = 0.035). Rural women were also more likely to report a patient-detected breast cancer than urban women (OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.01-2.11, p = 0.044).
conclusionsRecent immigrants and those residing in rural areas were more likely to report self-detecting their breast cancer. Given the persistent disparities with regard to breast cancer mortality, particularly among underserved communities, strategies addressing barriers to screening uptake in these populations may be warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39549160What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.