Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39549142›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2024

The safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with gastrointestinal cancer brain metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mohammad Amin Habibi, Hedye Babaei, Sahar Fathi Tavani, Pouria Delbari, Ali Allahdadi, Farhang Rashidi, Mohammad Shahir Eftekhar, Bardia Hajikarimloo, Jason P Sheehan

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Prophylactic cranial irradiation in the era of immunotherapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mohammad Amin HabibiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Mohammad.habibi1392@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7600-6925
Hedye BabaeiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8261-8565
Sahar Fathi TavaniSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1476-6915
Pouria DelbariSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ali AllahdadiSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farhang RashidiSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Shahir EftekharDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2174-5752
Bardia HajikarimlooDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. kjh7vp@uvahealth.org.
Jason P SheehanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central nervous system Tumors, including metastasis, are a considerable source of morbidity and mortality. Currently, treatment options such as surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy have been introduced to prevent the progression of the disease, but still, these patients do not have a good prognosis. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) reduces the damage to the surroundings by focusing the radiation on the tumor tissue. In this paper, we aim to investigate the outcomes of SRS on patients with gastrointestinal-originated brain metastases. A systematic review and meta-analysis used the PRISMA guideline from inception until 27th March 2024, utilizing the relevant key terms. Records were screened and included based on pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Demanding data was extracted and analyzed using STATA v. 17. This meta-analysis of 29 studies examining SRS for brain metastases from gastrointestinal cancers revealed several significant findings. The pooled distant intracranial disease rate was 33% (95% CI: 0.21-0.45). Local tumor control rates were high, with an overall pooled rate of 88% (95% CI: 0.83-0.92). Survival outcomes showed a 6-month overall survival (OS) rate of 47% (95% CI: 0.42-0.52), decreasing to 32% at one year and 11% at two years. The 5-year OS rate was 2% (95% CI: 0.01-0.03). Subgroup analyses revealed variations in outcomes based on primary tumor site, with gastric cancer patients showing better short-term survival (73% at six months) compared to hepatic primaries (31% at six months). The 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 67% (95% CI: 0.12-1.22). Tumor control outcomes showed complete regression in 11% of cases, partial regression in 44%, stable disease in 30%, and progression in 20%. The overall mortality rate was 84% (95% CI: 0.75-0.93). This meta-analysis supports the efficacy of SRS in managing brain metastases from gastrointestinal cancers. SRS offers effective local control and may improve quality of life despite poor long-term outcomes. The high rates of distant intracranial progression underscore the need for comprehensive management strategies addressing both local and systemic disease. Future research should optimize patient selection, combine SRS with novel systemic therapies, and identify predictive biomarkers to improve outcomes in this challenging patient population.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryHumansTreatment OutcomeBrain metastasisGastrointestinalStereotactic radiosurgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.