ReviewArchives of dermatological research2024
Recent progress in hematoporphyrin monomethyl ether-photodynamic therapy for port-wine stains: updates and insights.
Review in Archives of dermatological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Light Source Matching Strategies for Optimal Treatment Efficacy of HMME and m-THPC in Photodynamic Therapy of Vascular Lesions.Lasers in surgery and medicine · 2026Article
- Microneedles meet photomedicine: emerging strategies for diagnosis and therapy of skin diseases.Nanoscale advances · 2026Review
- Hemoporfin photodynamic therapy for port-wine stains in children: a prospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of the effects of hemoporfin-mediated photodynamic and Vbeam pulsed dye laser in the treatment of port-wine stains: a retrospective analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Port-wine stains (PWS) are congenital vascular malformations characterized by capillary malformations that persist and often darken over time. Traditional treatment methods, including laser therapy, have shown varying degrees of effectiveness and can be associated with significant side effects. Hematoporphyrin Monomethyl Ether-Photodynamic Therapy (HMME-PDT) has emerged as a promising alternative, offering targeted treatment with potentially fewer adverse effects. This paper aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and potential of HMME-PDT as a treatment strategy for PWS. It provides a comprehensive review of the literature and clinical investigations to assess the application and outcomes of HMME-PDT in treating PWS. Briefly introduce the nature of PWS, innovations and challenges in treatment, the mechanism of HMME-PDT, clinical effectiveness and sonographic appearance, safety and long-term effects, and challenges and suggestions for optimizing treatment. The review highlights the mechanism by which HMME-PDT works, focusing on its ability to target abnormal blood vessels selectively. Clinical evaluations included clinical and sonographic assessments to determine the efficacy of the treatment. The findings revealed significant improvements in the clinical appearance and sonographic features of vascular lesions following HMME-PDT. The paper also discusses the utility of dermoscopy in HMME-PDT applications, factors affecting treatment efficacy, the impact of thermal assistance on the effectiveness of PDT, and the management of adverse reactions through proper nursing care. The review underscores the considerable potential of HMME-PDT as an effective treatment for PWS, noting its promising outcomes in clinical and sonographic assessments. However, it also emphasizes the need for further research to standardize treatment protocols and assess long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39549139What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.