SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2024
Single-port robotic versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m
Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Cutting-edge choices: comparative outcomes of laparoscopic vs robotic cholecystectomy-a systematic review.Updates in surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Robotic vs Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients with BMI > 40 kg/mObesity surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Updates in surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of short-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy for patients ≥ 65 years of age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluating the safety of robotic total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer against the conventional laparoscopic approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Robotic vs laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with Billroth I and II reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in hepatobiliary procedures: a scoping review.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Single-incision robotic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience with the EDGE SP1000 robotic system at a Shanghai center.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Pediatric choledochal cysts on a single-incision robotic surgical platform: a non-randomized pilot study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Impact of body mass index on perioperative outcomes and short-term recovery profiles of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Robotic Gastrointestinal Surgery Compared to Conventional Approaches: An Umbrella Review of Clinical and Economic Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery in Europe: Where Do We Stand? A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Charting Progress: Clinical Outcomes and the Learning Curve of Robotic Cholecystectomy in Indian Surgical Practice.Cureus · 2025Article
- Reply to comment on: "Robotic vs laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with Billroth I and II reconstruction-a systematic review and meta-analysis" by our fellow colleagues Doctors Mehrab Neyazi, Rachana Mehta, Shubham Kumar and Ranjana Sah.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous studies have compared single-port robotic cholecystectomy (SPRC) to single-incision laparoscopic (SILC). However, there is not a systematic review and meta-analysis in patient with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
39549130What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.