ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2024
Microbial community evolution in a lab-scale reactor operated to obtain biomass for biochemical methane potential assays.
Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biochemical methane potential (BMP) test is an important tool to evaluate the methane production biodegradability and toxicity of different wastes or wastewaters. This is a key parameter for assessing design and feasibility issues in the full-scale implementation of anaerobic digestion processes. A standardized and storable inoculum is the key to obtain reproducible results. In Uruguay, a local enterprise dedicated to design and install anaerobic digesters operated a lab-scale bioreactor as a source of biomass for BMP tests, using a protocol previously described. This reactor was controlled and fed with a mixture of varied organic compounds (lipids, cellulolytic wastes, proteins). Biomass was reintroduced into the reactor after BMP assays to maintain a constant volume and biomass concentration. The aim of this work was to evaluate how the microbial community evolved during this operation and the effect of storing biomass in the refrigerator. The composition of the microbial communities was analyzed by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing using primers for Bacteria and Archaea. The methanogenic activity was determined, and the methanogens were quantified by mcrA qPCR. One sample was stored for a 5-month period in the refrigerator (4 °C); the activity and the microbial community composition were analyzed before and after storage. Results showed that applying the reported methodology, a reliable methanogenic sludge with an acceptable SMA was obtained even though the reactor suffered biomass alterations along the evaluated period. Refrigerating the acclimatized biomass for 5 months did not affect its activity nor its microbial composition according to the 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, even though changes in the mcrA abundance were observed. KEY POINTS: • The applied methodology was successful to obtain biomass suitable to perform BMP assays. • The microbial community was resilient to external biomass addition. • Biomass storage at 4 °C for 5 months did not alter the methanogenic activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.