ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2024
How I Do It: Madrid posterior component separation in 10 steps, with special consideration of its anatomy.
Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced view/extended totally extraperitoneal plasty (eTEP) Rives-Stoppa repair versus open Rives-Stoppa repair: a single-center retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Interparietal hernias after posterior component separation.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe Madrid Posterior Component Separation technique (Madrid PCS) is an approach for abdominal wall reconstruction that leverages anatomical landmarks to optimize outcomes. This manuscript describes ten essential steps for performing the Madrid PCS, focusing on technique, safety, and efficiency.
methodsA comprehensive step-by-step approach is outlined, beginning with the initial incision and adhesiolysis, progressing through retromuscular dissection, and concluding with lateral release and subxiphoid dissection. Emphasis is placed on key anatomical landmarks, tissue planes, and surgical maneuvers critical for each phase. Detailed tips and tricks, challenging scenarios, and potential risks are provided to enhance the reproducibility and safety of the procedure.
resultsApplying these ten steps provides an organized and methodical approach to the Madrid PCS. The focus on anatomical landmarks minimizes the risk of complications such as nerve injury, peritoneal tears, and inadvertent organ damage, while ensuring for the optimal placement of prosthetic materials.
conclusionAdherence to these ten steps, based on anatomical landmarks, significantly improves the safety and effectiveness of the Madrid PCS technique. By understanding the nuances of the procedure, surgeons can achieve consistent and reproducible results in complex abdominal wall reconstructions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39549068What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.