ArticleRegenerative medicine2024
ATMP clinical trials in the UK.
Article in Regenerative medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oncology drug development in the UK: analysis of the past 25 years and focus on the 2026 reboot of the clinical trial regulatory framework.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Review
- Tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy in melanoma: ready for prime time?British journal of cancer · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe UK advanced therapy medicinal product (ATMP) clinical trials database, produced annually by CGT Catapult, aims to assess the progress and state of the UK ATMP clinical development landscape. The aim of this article is to highlight key findings from the database and put them into context within the global landscape and various initiatives intended to attract ATMP developers to the UK.
methodA targeted search of GlobalData's clinical trial database was performed, followed by refinement so that only trials investigating products meeting ATMP definitions were included, and that each trial was only counted once in the analysis.
resultsThe 2023 data show that the number of ongoing ATMP clinical trials in the UK has remained approximately static, in contrast to a 10% reduction reported globally. Approximately 80% of these trials were commercially sponsored. Although most ATMP clinical trials are early phase, there is evidence indicating progression to later phase studies.
conclusionThe data indicate that the UK remains an attractive region for ATMP clinical trials. Factors including UK government investment in research, regulatory support offered by MHRA, and the Advanced Therapy Treatment Centre (ATTC) network of clinical sites, may contribute to the positive ecosystem available to developers of ATMPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.