Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39548846›Full record

ArticleBJU international2025

Oncological microdissection testicular sperm extraction (Onco-microTESE) outcomes for fertility preservation of patients with testicular cancer with azoospermia or severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia.

Jack B Fanshawe, Thomas Hughes, Karen Briggs, Raveen Sandher, Yacoub Khalaf, Tet Yap, Julia Kopeika, Majid Shabbir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJU international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jack B FanshaweDepartment of Urology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3732-217X
Thomas HughesDepartment of Urology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7846-1470
Karen BriggsDepartment of Urology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Raveen SandherDepartment of Urology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Yacoub KhalafThe Assisted Conception Unit, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Tet YapDepartment of Urology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Julia KopeikaThe Assisted Conception Unit, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Majid ShabbirDepartment of Urology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the success rate of oncological microdissection testicular sperm extraction (onco-microTESE) in patients with testicular cancer (TC) with azoospermia and severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT; <1 million/mL sperm) and to explore any factors that may predict success. PATIENTS AND

methodsCase series of outcomes from all consecutive patients (42 testes in 38 patients) that presented or were referred to a single specialist tertiary referral centre for fertility management in the context of TC with severe OAT or azoospermia between August 2015 and August 2022. Biochemical, radiological, and histological parameters were collected for all patients. All patients underwent onco-microTESE (simultaneous radical inguinal orchidectomy with ex vivo microTESE of the affected testis). Those with unsuccessful surgical sperm retrieval (SSR) from the affected testis underwent contemporaneous contralateral microTESE, if no contraindication was present. The primary outcome was successful SSR from the affected testicle sufficient for assisted reproductive techniques. Secondary outcomes included contralateral microTESE success, the time from referral to procedure, and the total successful fertility preservation rate.

resultsInitial onco-microTESE was successful in 19 of 31 patients (61%) with azoospermia. Contralateral microTESE was successful in a further two of eight patients with azoospermia with failed onco-microTESE. Overall, 22/31 patients with azoospermia (71%) had successful fertility preservation in this series. In addition, six of seven patients with severe OAT had further sperm harvested by onco-microTESE to maximise their fertility preservation. All surgery was performed within median (interquartile range) of 7 (5-13) days from presentation.

conclusionsOnco-microTESE represents an effective method of fertility preservation for sub-fertile patients with TC without delaying oncological treatment. Knowledge of the fertility status at first presentation is essential to allow for such additional options for optimal fertility preservation in TC.

Indexed as

AzoospermiaFertility PreservationMicrodissectionOligospermiaSperm RetrievalTesticular NeoplasmsAdultHumansMaleOrchiectomyRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeazoospermiafertility preservationoligoasthenoteratozoospermiasurgical sperm retrievaltesticular cancer

Identifiers

PMID39548846
PMCPMC11746000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.