Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39548768›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical entomology2025

A qualitative analysis of perceived risks and benefits of mosquito abatement and bite prevention strategies in Northeastern U.S. communities.

Emily M Mader, Nia Clements, Áine Lehane, Jody Gangloff-Kaufmann, Scott Crans, Chris Horton, Amelia Greiner Safi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical entomology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily M MaderDepartment of Entomology, Northeast Regional Center for Excellence in Vector-Borne Diseases, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2590-3540
Nia ClementsDepartment of Public and Ecosystem Health, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Áine LehaneDepartment of Entomology, Northeast Regional Center for Excellence in Vector-Borne Diseases, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3045-3858
Jody Gangloff-KaufmannNew York State Integrated Pest Management, Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Babylon, NY, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-4240-0383
Scott CransNew Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Mosquito Control Coordination, Trenton, NJ, USA.
Chris HortonBerkshire Mosquito Control Project, Massachusetts Department of Agricultural Resources, Pittsfield, MA, USA.
Amelia Greiner SafiDepartment of Public and Ecosystem Health, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6742-0219

Funding

American Mosquito Control Association Research 2023-01CDC HHS U01CK000509NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mosquito-borne disease (MBD) incidence is increasing in the United States (U.S.), presenting an evolving health threat. Assessments of public perceptions have revealed limited awareness of MBDs among the U.S. population. Our team used focus groups to gain an in-depth understanding of risk perceptions regarding mosquito exposure and pesticide use, and benefit perceptions and motivators for bite prevention strategies. A total of 37 individuals participated in focus groups across 3 states: New Jersey (n = 14), New York (n = 15), and Massachusetts (n = 8). Most participants were unfamiliar with public mosquito control services and felt they were not at high exposure risk to any MBDs. Overall, participants were supportive of investing public funds for mosquito surveillance. However, participants across all focus groups expressed concerns over ecosystem health and long-term consequences of pesticide use for mosquito control. Participants in every focus group referenced a risk assessment that weighed the risk of MBD exposure against the use of chemical control: once participants perceived MBDs as negatively impacting human and/or animal health in their area, sentiment swung largely to supporting the use of pesticides. In the absence of an obvious MBD threat, participants preferred nonchemical control interventions. Participants felt communication from mosquito control agencies should be accessible, disseminated across multiple venues, and should include instructions for the public during spray events, resources for individual bite prevention, and information on control products used. Our research results can inform the development of improved, evidence-based MBD outreach and educational resources that are acceptable, actionable, and relevant to Northeast communities.

Indexed as

CulicidaeHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInsect Bites and StingsMosquito ControlAdultAnimalsFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMassachusettsMiddle AgedNew JerseyNew YorkRisk AssessmentYoung Adultacceptabilitycommunicationmosquito-borne diseasemosquito controlrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID39548768
PMCPMC11919617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.