ReviewJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2025
Evidence Supporting Conservative Scar Management Interventions Following Burn Injury: A Review Article.
Review in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07578883 (Effects of the Scar Tissue Mobilization on Scar Thickness, Pliability and Quality of Life in Children With Upper Extremity Burns.), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of the Scar Tissue Mobilization on Scar Thickness, Pliability and Quality of Life in Children With Upper Extremity Burns.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- [Practice guideline for adult burn rehabilitation nursing (2026 edition)].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2026Guideline
- Within-Patient, Evaluator-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Gel Sheets in the Treatment of Hypertrophic Scar in Adult Burn Survivors.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2026Trial
- Rehabilitation Evaluation and Treatment for Skin Graft Complications of the Genitalia.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2026Article
- Rehabilitation Outcomes of Pediatric Burn Survivors in Saudi ArabiaSaudi medical journal · 2026Review
- Article
- Associations of a nursing care bundle with clinical outcomes in patients with severe burns and inhalation injury: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Wound Healing Properties of Plant-Based Hydrogel and Oleogel Formulations in a Rat Scald Burn Model.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conservative management for hypertrophic scars (HSc) and scar contractures is of utmost importance to optimally reintegrate burn survivors into society. Many conservative treatment interventions have been described in the literature for the management of HSc. Recent advancements in the literature pertaining to postburn scarring and HSc formation have advanced our understanding of the mechanisms that support or refute the use of common rehabilitation treatment modalities after burn injury. This is particularly relevant for recent advancements in the fields of mechanotransduction and neurogenic inflammation, resulting in the need for rehabilitation clinicians to reflect upon commonly employed treatment interventions. The aim of this review article is to summarize and clinically apply the evidence that supports or refutes the use of common conservative treatment interventions for scar management employed after burn injury. The following treatments are discussed, and mechanotransduction and neurogenic inflammation concepts are highlighted: (1) edema management (compression, positioning/elevation, pumping exercises, retrograde massage, and manual edema mobilization); (2) pressure therapy (including custom fabricated pressure garments, inserts, face masks, and other low-load long-duration orthotic devices); (3) gels or gel sheets; (4) combined pressure therapy and gels; (5) serial casting; (6) scar massage; and (7) passive stretching. This review supports the following statements: (1) Compression for edema reduction should be initiated 48-72 hours postinjury and continued for wounds that require longer than 21 days to heal until scar maturation; (2) Elevation, pumping exercises, and retrograde massage/MEM should be used in combination with other edema management techniques; (3) Custom-fabricated pressure garments should be applied once the edema is stabilized and adequate healing has occurred. Garments should be monitored on a regular basis to ensure that optional pressure, >15 mm Hg, is maintained, adding inserts when necessary. The wearing time should be >16 hours/day; (4) Gels for postburn scar management should extend beyond the scar; (5) Serial casting should be applied when contractures interfere with function; (6) Forceful scar massage should be avoided early in the wound healing process or when the scar is inflamed or breaks down; and (7) Other treatment modalities should be prioritized over passive stretching for scar management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.