Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39548748›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2025

Opposition to Banning Cigarette Filters and the Belief That Removing Filters Makes Cigarettes Much More Harmful Among Adults Who Smoke: Findings From the 2022 International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey.

Shannon Gravely, Thomas E Novotny, K Michael Cummings, Katherine A East, Andrew Hyland, Pete Driezen, Janet Hoek, Kylie Morphett, David Sellars, Richard J O'Connor and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shannon GravelyDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5224-9105
Thomas E NovotnyEpidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
K Michael CummingsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7103-7017
Katherine A EastDepartment of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9083-2131
Andrew HylandDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Pete DriezenDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2320-0999
Janet HoekDepartment of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4362-1539
Kylie MorphettNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4322-8825
David SellarsNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Richard J O'ConnorDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Anne C K QuahDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Geoffrey T FongDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Coral E GartnerNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6651-8035

Funding

Vaporized Nicotine Product Initiation Among Youth in the US, Canada, and England: Methods to Predict Uptake and Policy EfficacyP01CA200512 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI HAMMOND, DAVID · 2016 to 2025
$25.3M
CIHR FDN-148477National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia 2019252National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia GTN1198301NCI NIH HHS P01 CA200512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn line with historical tobacco industry marketing claims, many consumers perceive cigarettes with filters as less harmful than cigarettes without filters. However, scientific evidence indicates that cigarette filters do not reduce the risks associated with smoking. We examined opposition to banning the sale of cigarettes with filters, beliefs about whether removing filters makes cigarettes much more harmful, and whether this belief is associated with opposition to banning filters among adults who smoke cigarettes from four high-income countries. AIMS AND

methodsData are from 2980 adults who smoke cigarettes and participated in the 2022 ITC Smoking and Vaping Survey in Australia, Canada, England, and the United States. Weighted descriptives estimated opposition to a cigarette filter ban and the belief that removing filters makes cigarettes "much more," "a little more," "not more" harmful, or "don't know." Adjusted regression analyses examined the association between opposition to banning filters (vs. support/don't know) and the belief that removing filters would make cigarettes much more harmful (vs. otherwise).

resultsAcross all countries, 69.3% opposed banning filters, 11.5% of respondents supported banning filters, and 19.1% did not know (main effect for country differences: p = .001). Country differences remained significant after adjusting for covariates (p = .047), with adults who smoke in Australia and the United States being significantly more likely to oppose a filter ban than those in England. Canada did not differ significantly from any of the countries. Nearly half (45.9%) believe that removing filters would make cigarettes much more harmful, 28.6% reported a little more harmful, 15.3% were unsure, and 10.2% reported not more harmful (country differences: p = .002). Country differences were no longer significant after adjustment (p = .18). Believing that removing filters makes cigarettes much more harmful was strongly associated with opposing a filter ban (78.5%) (vs. otherwise: 62.1%, p < .001).

conclusionsAcross all four countries, three-quarters of adults who smoke erroneously believe that removing filters would make cigarettes more harmful, and believing that doing so would make cigarettes much more harmful was the strongest predictor of opposing a filter ban. IMPLICATIONS: More than 90% of manufactured cigarettes worldwide contain filters. Contrary to marketing claims by the tobacco industry, cigarette filters do not offer any health protection from cigarette smoke; however, three-quarters of adults who smoke erroneously believe that cigarettes with filters are much less harmful than cigarettes without filters. To protect public health and the environment, the World Health Organization has recommended that policy-makers consider banning cigarette filters as they are unnecessary single-use plastics.

Indexed as

FiltrationSmokersSmokingTobacco ProductsVapingAdolescentAdultAustraliaCanadaEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTobacco Control

Identifiers

PMID39548748
PMCPMC12280163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.