ReviewJournal of medical case reports2024
Visual outcome after monocular implantation of extended depth of focus intraocular lens in a patient with iridodialysis: a case report and literature review.
Review in Journal of medical case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIridodialysis, the separation of the iris root from the ciliary body, typically results from trauma and can lead to significant visual impairment. This case report is novel as it demonstrates the successful management of iridodialysis using an extended depth of focus intraocular lens in a patient with a slightly irregular pupil. CASE PRESENTATION: A 34-year-old Hispanic man presented with reduced vision and pain in his right eye following blunt trauma from a nail at work. Examination revealed a small temporal corneal stromal scar, traumatic posterior subcapsular cataract, two inferior iridodialysis defects, and a superiorly displaced dyscoric oval pupil. Snellen uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/400. The patient opted for an extended depth of focus intraocular lens implantation to meet his visual demands for distance and intermediate vision without glasses. Cataract surgery with capsular tension ring, extended depth of focus intraocular lens implantation, iridodialysis repair, and suture pupilloplasty were performed uneventfully. At 1 month postoperatively, uncorrected distance visual acuity improved to 20/40, while uncorrected intermediate visual acuity and uncorrected near visual acuity were 20/20. A central, relatively round, and slightly inferiorly peaked pupil was achieved. A steroid response intraocular pressure rise at postoperative month 2 required intraocular pressure-lowering medications, and symptomatic posterior capsular opacity developed at 8 months postoperatively. At 11 months postoperatively, selective laser trabeculoplasty and laser capsulotomy were performed. At 4-year follow-up, visual acuity measurements remained stable, and intraocular pressure was normal without any medication. The patient was satisfied with the visual and cosmetic outcomes.
conclusionThis case demonstrates that extended depth of focus intraocular lenses can be a viable option for patients with slightly irregular pupils following suture repair of the iris and pupil. The successful visual and cosmetic outcomes in this patient suggest that extended depth of focus intraocular lenses may be considered in similar complex cases, providing a balance of near, intermediate, and distance vision without significant visual disturbances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.