Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39548538›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Why are organisational approvals needed for low-risk staff studies in the UK? Procedures, barriers, and burdens.

Lesley Dunleavy, Ruth Board, Seamus Coyle, Andrew Dickman, John Ellershaw, Amy Gadoud, Jaime Halvorsen, Nick Hulbert-Williams, Liz Lightbody, Stephen Mason and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Lesley DunleavyInternational Observatory On End of Life Care, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4AT, UK.
Ruth BoardDepartment of Oncology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, PR2 9HT, UK.
Seamus CoyleDepartment of Palliative Medicine, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, L7 8YA, UK.
Andrew DickmanAcademic Palliative and End of Life Care Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Prescot Street, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK.
John EllershawPalliative Care Unit, Room G036 North West Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK.
Amy GadoudLancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4AT, UK.
Jaime HalvorsenNIHR Clinical Research Network North West Coast, Liverpool, L3 5TF, UK.
Nick Hulbert-WilliamsDepartment of Psychology, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, L39 4QP, UK.
Liz LightbodySchool of Nursing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, UK.
Stephen MasonPalliative Care Unit, Room G036 North West Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK.
Amara Callistus NwosuLancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4AT, UK.
Andrea PartridgeLancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4AT, UK.
Sheila PayneInternational Observatory On End of Life Care, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4AT, UK.
Nancy PrestonInternational Observatory On End of Life Care, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4AT, UK.
Brooke SwashSchool of Psychology, University of Chester, Chester, CH1 4BJ, UK.
Vanessa TaylorSchool of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH, UK.
Catherine WalsheInternational Observatory On End of Life Care, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4AT, UK. c.walshe@lancaster.ac.uk.

Funding

NIHR Palliative and End of Life Care Research Partnerships Funding Committee NIHR135334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth care staff should be given the opportunity to participate in research, but recruiting clinicians via their employing organisation is not always straightforward or quick in the UK. Unlike many countries outside the UK, very low-risk survey, interview or focus group studies can be subject to some of the same governance approval procedures as interventional studies. An exemplar study carried out by the NIHR funded Palliative Care Research Partnership North West Coast is used to highlight the challenges still faced by researchers and health care organisations when setting up a low-risk staff study across multiple NHS and non-NHS sites.

methodsA study database was created and information was collected on the first point of contact with the clinical site, Health Research Authority (HRA) and local organisational approval times, time from trust or hospice agreement to the first survey participant recruited and overall site survey recruitment numbers. Descriptive statistics (median, range) were used to analyse these data.

resultsAcross participating NHS trusts, it took a median of 147.5 days (range 99-195) from initial contact with the local collaborator to recruitment of the first survey participant and hospice sites mirrored these lengthy timescales (median 142 days, range 110-202). The lengthiest delays in the HRA approval process were the period between asking NHS trusts to assess whether they had capacity and capability to support the research and them granting local agreement. Local approval times varied between trusts and settings which may indicate organisations are applying national complex guidance differently.

conclusionsThere is the potential for HRA processes to use more NHS resources than the research study itself when recruiting to a low-risk staff study across multiple organisations. There is a need to reduce unnecessary administrative burden and bureaucracy to give clinicians and research staff more opportunities to participate in research, and to free up NHS R&D departments, research nurses and clinicians to focus on more demanding and patient focused research studies. Hospices need standardised guidance on how to assess the risk of being involved in low-risk research without adopting the unnecessarily complex systems that are currently used within the NHS.

Indexed as

State MedicineHealth Services ResearchHumansPalliative CareUnited KingdomHealth services researchMethodological studiesResearchSurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39548538
PMCPMC11566500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.