Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39548523›Full record

ArticlePhilosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM2024

Assessing attitudes toward research and plagiarism among medical students: a multi-site study.

Andrija Pavlovic, Nina Rajovic, Srdjan Masic, Vedrana Pavlovic, Dejana Stanisavljevic, Tatjana Pekmezovic, Dusanka Lukic, Aleksandra Ignjatovic, Miodrag Stojanovic, Dragan Spaic and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Andrija PavlovicDepartment of Humanities, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia.
Nina RajovicInstitute for Medical Statistics and Informatics, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia.
Srdjan MasicDepartment of Primary Health Care and Public Health, University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Medicine, Foca, Bosnia and Herzegovina. srdjan.masic@ues.rs.ba.
Vedrana PavlovicInstitute for Medical Statistics and Informatics, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia.
Dejana StanisavljevicInstitute for Medical Statistics and Informatics, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia.
Tatjana PekmezovicInstitute of Epidemiology, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia.
Dusanka LukicUniversity of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia.
Aleksandra IgnjatovicDepartment of Medical Statistics and Informatics, University of Nis, Faculty of Medicine, Nis, Serbia.
Miodrag StojanovicDepartment of Medical Statistics and Informatics, University of Nis, Faculty of Medicine, Nis, Serbia.
Dragan SpaicDepartment of Primary Health Care and Public Health, University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Medicine, Foca, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Nikola MilicUniversity of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia.
Aleksa DespotovicInstitute for Medical Statistics and Informatics, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia.
Tamara StanisavljevicDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia.
Valerija JanicijevicUniversity of Belgrade, Teacher Education Faculty, Belgrade, Serbia.
Danijela TiosavljevicDepartment of Humanities, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia.
Natasa MilicInstitute for Medical Statistics and Informatics, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia. silly_stat@yahoo.com.

Funding

University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Medicine Foca, RS, BiH 01-3-36Wellcome Trust 200110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch involves the systematic collection and analysis of data to enhance understanding of a particular phenomenon. Participation in medical research is crucial for advancing healthcare practices. However, there has been limited focus on understanding the factors that motivate medical students to engage in research. Additionally, in the era of e-learning, the easy accessibility of online resources has contributed to a widespread 'copy-paste culture' among digital-native students, which is recognized in academia as plagiarism. Existing studies suggest that a contributing factor to the increasing prevalence of plagiarism is students' limited understanding of this act. The purpose of this study was to assess medical students' attitudes toward research and plagiarism, and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Attitudes Toward Research (ATR) and Attitudes Toward Plagiarism (ATP) questionnaires.

methodsThis was a multicenter study conducted among medical undergraduate and postgraduate students attending the three medical universities who were involved in research. Students' attitudes toward research and plagiarism were assessed using the ATR and ATP questionnaires. The research instruments underwent translation and cultural adaptation in accordance with internationally accepted methodology. The psychometric properties of the ATR and ATP, including validity and reliability, were assessed. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the model's fit to the data.

resultsThe ATR and ATP questionnaires were completed by 793 medical students who were involved in research (647 undergraduates and 146 PhD students). Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.917 and 0.822 indicated excellent and good scale reliability for the ATR and ATP questionnaires, respectively. The five-and three- factor structures of ATR and ATP have been validated with maximum likelihood confirmatory analysis, and the results demonstrated an adequate level of model fit (TLI = 0.930, CFI = 0.942 and TLI = 0.924, CFI = 0.943, respectively). Medical students showed a high degree of positive attitudes toward research and favorable scores across all three domains of attitudes toward plagiarism. In multivariate regression models, age was found to be positively associated with favorable attitudes of research usefulness, positive attitudes, relevance to life subscales and total ATR scale (p < 0.001), while PhD study level was related to research anxiety (p < 0.001) and favorable attitudes across all three ATP domains (p < 0.001).

conclusionMedical students who were involved in research showed a high degree of favorable attitudes toward research and plagiarism. Adjusting medical school curricula to include research courses would broaden the students' interest in scientific research and maximize their impact on the full preservation of research ethics and integrity.

Indexed as

PlagiarismStudents, MedicalAdultBiomedical ResearchFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAttitudesEthicsMedical educationPlagiarismQuestionnaireResearch

Identifiers

PMID39548523
PMCPMC11566133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.