ArticleBMC urology2024
Mucinous adenocarcinoma in kidneys with developmental anomalies - a report of two cases.
Article in BMC urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Slippery Diagnosis: Primary Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Renal Pelvis in an Elderly Man.International journal of surgical pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary mucinous adenocarcinomas of the kidney are rare and pose a challenge for preoperative diagnosis. The histogenesis of these tumours remains largely unknown, with three proposed theories: chronic irritation, differentiation of celomic epithelium, and kidney maldevelopment. Here, we present two cases of renal mucinous adenocarcinoma in patients with developmental renal anomalies, specifically a duplex collecting system and a horseshoe kidney. CASE PRESENTATION: First, A 50-year-old male presented with loin pain and jelly-like discharge in urine with a duplex collecting system and gross hydronephrosis of the upper moiety on imaging. The patient underwent upper polar nephrectomy with controlled drainage of 1.5 L of mucinous fluid. Histopathology was suggestive of mucinous borderline cystic neoplasm with invasive microcarcinoma. The patient presented one year later, with a hydronephrotic lower moiety of the left kidney and a rectus abdominis mass. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of the mass revealed papillary adenocarcinoma with histological resemblance to the renal pelvis lesion, establishing it as a metastasis from the primary renal malignancy. Second, A 53-year-old male who had undergone right laparoscopic cyst deroofing for a symptomatic renal cyst, whose postoperative histology revealed findings consistent with mucinous adenocarcinoma, presented with flank pain and palpable retroperitoneal mass. Imaging revealed a horseshoe kidney morphology with a large multilobulated hypodense non-enhancing cystic lesion arising from the right kidney. Cyst excision with right open radical nephrectomy was performed. Gross examination revealed multiple cystic spaces replacing renal parenchyma, filled with gelatinous material. Microscopy was suggestive of recurrent mucinous adenocarcinoma.
conclusionsRenal mucinous cystadenocarcinomas can be associated with anomalous kidneys. Definitive diagnosis relies on histopathology, and these tumours are recognized for their aggressive nature. Complete resection is the preferred treatment, but further studies are needed to assess the efficacy of adjuvant treatment, given the poor prognosis and high likelihood of recurrence. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.