ArticleBMC pediatrics2024
Risk factors and discrimination model for screen exposure among children under 3 years: findings from Fujian province in China.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCompliance with screen time guidelines among children worldwide remains low, and there is insufficient evidence on the current prevalence in China. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of compliance with screen time guidelines among children under 3 years old in Fujian Province, East China, identify risk factors and their independent effects, and develop a risk discrimination model for targeted interventions.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among low-income families recruited from welfare programs at 96 sites in both urban and rural areas of Fujian Province, China. Face-to-face interviews gathered sociodemographic data, lifestyle information, attitudes towards screen exposure, and details on screen media device ownership. A multivariable logistic regression model was employed to identify independent risk factors for compliance with screen time guidelines, while the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the model's discrimination ability.
resultsA total of 4,707 children participated in the survey. The rates of compliance with screen time guidelines were 56.8% for children under 1 year old, 18.8% for those between 1 and 2 years old, and 81.9% for those between 2 and 3 years old. The multivariable regression analysis identified negative attitudes towards screen exposure, co-viewing and engagement, as well as single child, as significant positive independent factors for compliance with the guidelines. The risk discrimination model demonstrated good performance, with an AUC of 0.845 and 0.812 in the two younger age groups, but showed medium discrimination with an AUC of 0.691 for children between 2 and 3 years old.
conclusionsCompliance with screen time guidelines among young children in Fujian Province, East China, is generally adequate, but notably low among children between 1 and 2 years old. Targeted interventions are needed to improve compliance, particularly for this age group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.