Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39548494›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2024

Field surveys in rural Tanzania reveal key opportunities for targeted larval source management and species sanitation to control malaria in areas dominated by Anopheles funestus.

Betwel J Msugupakulya, Nicolaus S Mhumbira, Dawson T Mziray, Masoud Kilalangongono, Mohamed Jumanne, Halfan S Ngowo, Najat F Kahamba, Alex J Limwagu, Meleji L Mollel, Prashanth Selvaraj and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Seasonal variation and interspecies dynamics amongmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Betwel J MsugupakulyaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania. jbetwel@ihi.or.tz.
Nicolaus S MhumbiraEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Dawson T MzirayEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Masoud KilalangongonoEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Mohamed JumanneEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Halfan S NgowoEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Najat F KahambaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Alex J LimwaguEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Meleji L MollelHealth Department, Ulanga District Council, P.O. Box 4, Ulanga, Tanzania.
Prashanth SelvarajInstitute for Disease Modeling, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, USA.
Anne L Wilson *Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Fredros O Okumu *Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1214408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarval source management (LSM) is re-emerging as a critical malaria intervention to address challenges associated with core vector control tools, such as insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), and to accelerate progress towards elimination. Presently, LSM is not widely used in rural settings and is instead more commonly applied in urban and arid settings. A systematic entomological assessment was conducted in rural communities of southeastern Tanzania, where insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) are widely used, to explore opportunities for deploying LSM to improve malaria control.

methodsAquatic habitat surveys were conducted in 2022 and 2023 to understand habitat usage by different mosquito vectors, covering five villages during the rainy season and seven villages during the dry season. Additionally, samples of adult mosquitoes were collected to assess the role of various Anopheles species in malaria transmission in the area, and to explore opportunities for species sanitation using targeted LSM.

resultsAdult mosquito surveys showed that in this area, the total entomological inoculation rates (EIR) for indoor collections were 20.1 and 6.5 infectious bites per person per year for outdoors. Anopheles funestus and Anopheles arabiensis were the only Anopheles vectors identified. Anopheles funestus was responsible for over 97.6% of the malaria transmission indoors and 95.4% outdoors. The concurrent larval surveys found that habitats with late instar An. arabiensis and An. funestus comprised only a small subset of 11.2%-16.5% of all water bodies in the rainy season, and 9.7%-15.2% in the dry season. In terms of size, these habitats covered 66.4%-68.2% of the total habitat areas in the wet season, reducing to 33.9%-40.6% in the dry season. From the rainy season to the dry season, the surface area of habitats occupied by An. arabiensis and An. funestus decreased by 92.0% to 97.5%, while the number of habitats occupied by An. arabiensis and An. funestus decreased by 38.0% to 57.3%. Anopheles funestus preferred large, permanent habitats with clear water and vegetation year-round, while An. arabiensis showed contrasting seasonal preferences, favouring sunlit still waters in the rainy season and larger, opaque habitats in the dry season.

conclusionThese findings suggest that An. funestus, which is the dominant malaria vector in the area, mediating over 95% of malaria transmission, preferentially occupies only a small subset of uniquely identifiable aquatic habitats in both wet and dry seasons. This presents an opportunity to expand LSM in rural settings by carefully targeting An. funestus habitats, which might be effective and logistically feasible as a complementary approach alongside existing interventions. Further research should assess the impact of targeted LSM for species sanitation compared to blanket LSM.

Indexed as

AnophelesLarvaMalariaMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsRural PopulationAnimalsEcosystemHumansSanitationSeasonsTanzania

Identifiers

PMID39548494
PMCPMC11568556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.