Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39548460›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2024

Multi-omics-driven discovery of invasive patterns and treatment strategies in CA19-9 positive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Delin Ma, Pengcheng Wei, Hengkang Liu, Jialing Hao, Zhuomiaoyu Chen, Yingming Chu, Zuyin Li, Wenzai Shi, Zhigao Yuan, Qian Cheng and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Delin Ma *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Pengcheng Wei *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hengkang LiuPeking University-Yunnan Baiyao International Medical Research Center, Beijing, 100191, China.
Jialing HaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhuomiaoyu ChenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yingming ChuPeking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Zuyin LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wenzai ShiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Peking University International Hospital, Life Park Road No.1 Life Science Park of Zhong Guancun, Chang Ping District, Beijing, 102206, China.
Zhigao YuanDepartment of General Surgery, Civil Aviation General Hospital, Beijing, 100123, China.
Qian ChengDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jie GaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jiye ZhuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China. gandanwk@vip.sina.com.
Zhao LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China. lizhao@pku.edu.cn.

Funding

Capital Health Research and Development of Special Fund 2022-2-4084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a malignant tumor with a poor prognosis, predominantly CA19-9 positive. High CA19-9 levels correlate with increased aggressiveness and worse outcomes. This study employs multi-omics analysis to reveal molecular features and identify therapeutic targets of CA19-9 positive ICC, aiming to support individualized treatment.

methodsData from seven clinical cohorts, two whole-exome sequencing cohorts, six RNA sequencing/microarray cohorts, one proteomic cohort, 20 single-cell RNA sequencing samples, and one spatial transcriptome sample were analyzed. Key findings were validated on tissue microarrays from 52 ICC samples.

resultsCA19-9 positive ICC exhibited poorer OS (median 24.1 v.s. 51.5 months) and RFS (median 11.7 v.s. 28.2 months) compared to negative group (all P < 0.05). Genomic analysis revealed a higher KRAS mutation frequency in the positive group and a greater prevalence of IDH1/2 mutations in the negative group (all P < 0.05). Transcriptomic analysis indicated upregulated glycolysis pathways in CA19-9 positive ICC. Single-cell analysis identified specific glycolysis-related cell subclusters associated with poor prognosis, including Epi_SLC2A1, CAF_VEGFA, and Mph_SPP1. Higher hypoxia in the CA19-9 positive group led to metabolic reprogramming and promoted these cells' formation. These cells formed interactive communities promoting epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and angiogenesis. Drug sensitivity analysis identified six potential therapeutic drugs.

conclusionsThis study systematically elucidated the clinical, genomic, transcriptomic, and immune features of CA19-9 positive ICC. It reveals glycolysis-associated cellular communities and their cancer-promoting mechanisms, enhancing our understanding of ICC and laying the groundwork for individualized therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

CholangiocarcinomaAgedBile Duct NeoplasmsCA-19-9 AntigenCohort StudiesFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenomicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiomicsMutationNeoplasm InvasivenessPrognosisCA-19-9 AntigenCA19-9GlycolysisHypoxiaIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinomaMulti-omics

Identifiers

PMID39548460
PMCPMC11568536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.