Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39548456›Full record

Trial reportMalaria journal2024

Efficacy of attractive targeted sugar bait stations against malaria in Western Province Zambia: epidemiological findings from a two-arm cluster randomized phase III trial.

Ruth A Ashton, Kochelani Saili, Chama Chishya, Handrinah Banda Yikona, Annie Arnzen, Erica Orange, Chanda Chitoshi, John Chulu, Titus Tobolo, Frank Ndalama and 13 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Malaria journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04800055 (Attractive Targeted Sugar Bait Phase III Trial in Zambia), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04800055 naunknown statusnot on this map

Attractive Targeted Sugar Bait Phase III Trial in Zambia

TypeinterventionalSponsorPATHRan2020 to 2023Enrolled3,480ConditionsMalaria, Malaria,Falciparum, Vector-Borne Transmission of InfectionArmsAttractive Targeted Sugar Bait
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Integrated vector management for malaria control: a review of approaches and effectiveness.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Ruth A AshtonCentre for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal Street, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA. rashton@tulane.edu.
Kochelani SailiPATH, Kaoma, Zambia.
Chama ChishyaPATH, Kaoma, Zambia.
Handrinah Banda YikonaPATH, Kaoma, Zambia.
Annie ArnzenPATH, Seattle, WA, USA.
Erica OrangePATH, Seattle, WA, USA.
Chanda ChitoshiPATH, Kaoma, Zambia.
John ChuluPATH, Kaoma, Zambia.
Titus ToboloPATH, Kaoma, Zambia.
Frank NdalamaPATH, Kaoma, Zambia.
Irene KyomuhangiCentre for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal Street, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Willy NgulubeNational Malaria Elimination Centre, Lusaka, Zambia.
Hawela MoongaNational Malaria Elimination Centre, Lusaka, Zambia.
Jacob ChirwaNational Malaria Elimination Centre, Lusaka, Zambia.
Laurence SlutskerIndependent Consultant, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Joseph WagmanPATH, Washington, DC, USA.
Javan ChandaPATH, Lusaka, Zambia.
John MillerPATH, Lusaka, Zambia.
Kafula SilumbePATH, Lusaka, Zambia.
Busiku HamainzaNational Malaria Elimination Centre, Lusaka, Zambia.
Thomas P EiseleCentre for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal Street, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Joshua YukichCentre for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal Street, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Megan LittrellIndependent Consultant, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Direktion für Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit 81067480Gates Foundation INV-007509UK Aid 30041-105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAttractive targeted sugar bait (ATSB) stations containing bait (to attract) and ingestion toxicant (to kill) sugar-foraging mosquitoes are hypothesized to reduce malaria transmission by shortening the lifespan of Anopheles vectors.

methodsA two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial (cRCT) was conducted in Western Province Zambia. Seventy clusters of 250-350 households were assigned (1:1) by restricted randomization to an intervention arm (ATSB) or control arm (no ATSB) in the context of standard of care vector control (insecticide-treated nets and/or indoor residual spraying). Two ATSB stations (Westham Sarabi, 0.11% dinotefuran w/w) were maintained on exterior walls of eligible household structures for a 7-month deployment period (December-June) during the high malaria transmission season. The primary outcome was clinical malaria incidence among two consecutive seasonal cohorts of children aged 1-14 years, followed-up monthly from January-June in 2022 and 2023. Secondary outcome was Plasmodium falciparum prevalence among individuals aged over six months. Analysis compared clinical malaria incidence and prevalence between arms among the intention-to-treat population.

resultsATSB coverage, assessed by cross-sectional survey, was 98.3% in March-April 2022 and 89.5% in March-April 2023. 4494 children contributed any follow-up time to the cohort, with 2313 incident malaria cases in the intervention arm (1.28 per child per six-month transmission season), and 2449 in the control arm (1.38 per child-season). The incidence rate ratio between the two arms was 0.91 (95% CI 0.72-1.15, p = 0.42). 2536 individuals participated in cross-sectional surveys, with prevalence of P. falciparum 50.7% in the intervention arm and 53.5% in the control arm. The odds ratio between the two arms was 0.89 (95% CI 0.66-1.18, p = 0.42). Secondary covariable-adjusted and subgroup analyses did not substantially alter the findings. No serious adverse events associated with the intervention were reported.

conclusionsTwo ATSB stations deployed per eligible structure for two consecutive transmission seasons did not result in a statistically significant reduction in clinical malaria incidence among children aged 1-14 years or in P. falciparum prevalence in rural western Zambia. Further studies are needed to assess the efficacy of ATSB stations in different settings and with different deployment strategies.

trial registrationThe trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04800055).

Indexed as

Malaria, FalciparumMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsAdolescentAnimalsAnophelesChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantInsecticidesMalePrevalenceInsecticidesSugarsAttractive targeted sugar baitCluster randomized controlled trialVector controlZambia

Identifiers

PMID39548456
PMCPMC11566550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.