ArticleBMC pediatrics2024
Patient-centered medical homes and vision care for children: a cross-sectional analysis with data from the national survey of children's health 2018-2019.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adherence to Red Reflex and Vision Screening Recommendations: A Deep Dive into Primary Care Implementation Gaps.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVision screening as part of well-child visits is recommended annually for US children 3 to 6 years. However, 63% of children do not get a vision screening in well-child visits. The Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) improves the receipt of preventive care visits in other medical specialties but it is unknown if it improves receipt of vision screening. The objective of this study is to determine whether caregiver-reported receipt of care in a PCMH is associated with receiving a vision screening test in a well-child visit for children 3 to 6 years in a pediatrician/general doctor's office ('primary care').
methodPopulation-based data for US children aged 3 to 6 years was derived from the National Survey of Children's Health (2018-2019). Children were excluded if they did not have a well-child visit in the previous 12 months. The primary exposure was receipt of care in a PCMH ('PCMH care'), and the primary outcome was receipt of a vision screening in primary care. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and predicted probabilities were computed for children with and without PCMH care.
resultsAmong 9,587 children with well-child visits, 4,984 (50.9%) were males. There were 1,107 (23.3%) Hispanic, 6704 (52.8%) White/Non-Hispanic and 545 (11.8%) Black/Non-Hispanic children. There were 5,482 (51.8%) children who received PCMH care. Of those with PCMH care, 2,629 (52.2%) received a vision screening in primary care. Those with PCMH care (52.2%) had a higher odds of receiving a vision screening (aOR, 1.31; 95% CI 1.11, 1.55) in primary care compared to children without PCMH care (42.8%). The predicted probability of vision screening in primary care was 50.8% (95% CI 48.2, 53.5) for children that received PCMH care, and 44.3% (95% CI 41.3, 47.3) without PCMH care.
conclusionsCaregiver-reported receipt of PCMH care was associated with a greater likelihood of vision screening for children 3 to 6 years in a well-child visit. Further studies are needed to understand the mechanisms through which PCMH care contributes to the greater odds of vision screening in primary care to inform the creation of strategic interventions to prevent vision loss and its long-term implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.