ArticleBMC pediatrics2024
Identification of risk factors for necrotizing enterocolitis in twins: a case-control matching analysis of over ten-years' experience.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding NEC: epigenetic biomarkers for risk stratification and prognosis.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Necrotizing enterocolitis: risk factors and predictive modeling in a cohort of preterm infants. A case-control study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Twins and Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Genetic Relevance.Current pediatric reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe identification of risk factors is crucial for the clinical prevention and diagnosis of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Monochorionic twins (MCT), due to the high genetic homogeneity, provided a valuable model for investigating the risk factors of various diseases. This study aimed to explore the risk factors for NEC using MCT.
methodsA retrospective review was conducted on the medical records of monochorionic twins (MCT) treated at Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center from January 2012 to March 2023. We compared perinatal condition, feeding and preceding condition between MCT pairs with NEC (NEC MCT) and without NEC(No NEC MCT).Logistic regression analysis was utilized to identify independent risk factors.
resultIn 85 pairs of monochorionic twins (MCT), NEC occurred in one twin in 78.8% of cases, whereas both twins were affected in 21.2% of cases. In the final cohort of 60 pairs of MCT, several parameters were found to differ significantly between NEC MCT group and No NEC MCT group. Compared to No NEC MCT group, the incidence of umbilical cord abnormalities was significantly higher in the NEC MCT group (25% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.014). Meanwhile, NEC MCT group showed higher prevalence of SGA infants (48.3% vs. 21.7%, P = 0.002) and sFGR (38.3% vs. 6.7%, P = 0.000). Furthermore, TTTs (13.3% vs. 3.3%, P = 0.027) and septicemia (25% vs. 5%, P = 0.002) were more common in NEC MCT group. In a multivariable logistic regression model, sFGR (OR 6.81,95%CI 2.1-21.9, p = 0.001) was eventually output as an independent risk factor.
conclusionNon-genetic factors play a predominant role in the pathogenesis of NEC. Umbilical cord abnormalities, SGA, sFGR, TTTs and septicemia significantly increase the risk of NEC. sFGR is an independent risk factor of NEC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.