ArticleBMC pediatrics2024
The diagnostic value of peripheral blood lymphocyte testing in children with infectious mononucleosis.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The PD-1/PD-L1 pathway and Epstein-Barr virus.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the diagnostic value of peripheral blood lymphocyte testing in children with infectious mononucleosis (IM).
methodsA total of 135 children with IM as the IM group and 100 healthy volunteers as the healthy group were included in this retrospective study. Peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets marked as CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD16 + CD56+, and CD19 + in the peripheral blood were quantified using flow cytometry. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test, Kruskal-Wallis test, AUROC curve, and Kappa consistency test to assess the diagnostic value of these markers in IM.
resultsThe AUROC curve for CD8 + cells and for CD4+/CD8 + ratios both achieved a value of 1 with the sensitivity and specificity of 100% (P<0.001). The Kappa coefficients were 1 for CD8+, CD4+/CD8 + ratios and the combined EBV analysis, indicating a 100% consistency with the clinical diagnosis. Significant differences were also observed in the CD3+, CD4+, CD16 + CD56+, and CD19 + lymphocyte subsets between the IM group and the healthy group (P<0.05).
conclusionThe evaluation of CD8 + and CD4+/CD8 + ratios in peripheral blood lymphocytes represents a significant advancement in the diagnosis of IM. Peripheral blood lymphocyte testing offers a reliable, sensitive, and specific diagnostic tool to enhance the clinical management of children with IM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.