ReviewJournal of neurodevelopmental disorders2024
Predicting neurodevelopmental disorders using machine learning models and electronic health records - status of the field.
Review in Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence support for diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders during childhood: an umbrella review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Wearable Sensors in Rett Syndrome-What Physiological Markers Are Informative for Monitoring Disease States?Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Early autism detection: a review of emerging technologies, biomarkers, and explainable AI approaches.Molecular brain · 2025Review
- Leveraging and Harnessing Generative Artificial Intelligence to Mitigate the Burden of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (NDDs) in Children.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Disclosing the Complexities of Childhood Neurodevelopmental Disorders.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) is increasingly used to identify patterns that could predict neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). One key source of multilevel data for ML prediction models includes population-based registers and electronic health records. These can contain rich information on individual and familial medical histories and socio-demographics. This review summarizes studies published between 2010-2022 that used ML algorithms to develop predictive models for NDDs using population-based registers and electronic health records. A literature search identified 1191 articles, of which 32 were retained. Of these, 47% developed ASD prediction models and 25% ADHD models. Classical ML methods were used in 82% of studies and in particular tree-based prediction models performed well. The sensitivity of the models was lower than 75% for most studies, while the area under the curve (AUC) was greater than 75%. The most important predictors were patient and familial medical history and sociodemographic factors. Using private in-house datasets makes comparing and validating model generalizability across studies difficult. The ML model development and reporting guidelines were adopted only in a few recently reported studies. More work is needed to harness the power of data for detecting NDDs early.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.