Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39548377›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2024

Comparison of the oral health status of nursing home residents using the current and the newly developed interRAI oral health section (OHS-interRAI): a cross-sectional study.

Emilie Schoebrechts, Johanna de Almeida Mello, Patricia A I Vandenbulcke, Hein P J van Hout, Jan De Lepeleire, Anja Declercq, Dominique Declerck, Joke Duyck

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emilie SchoebrechtsDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, Population Studies in Oral Health, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. emilie.schoebrechts@kuleuven.be.
Johanna de Almeida MelloDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, Population Studies in Oral Health, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Patricia A I VandenbulckeDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, Population Studies in Oral Health, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Hein P J van HoutDepartments of General Practice and Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan De LepeleireDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Center for General Practice, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Anja DeclercqCenter for Care Research and Consultancy, LUCAS, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Dominique DeclerckDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, Population Studies in Oral Health, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Joke DuyckDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, Population Studies in Oral Health, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

KU Leuven C24M-20-063Research Foundation Flanders TBM T003220N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegular dental l check-ups and good oral hygiene are challenging for nursing home residents, resulting in poor oral health. The interRAI instrument for Long-Term Care Facilities (LTCF) enables caregivers to evaluate residents' health, including oral health, and to integrate oral care into general care planning. Because the current oral heal1th section in the interRAI instruments does not accurately identify residents who need help with daily oral care or dental referral, the interRAI Oral Health Section (OHS-interRAI) was developed. The OHS-interRAI differs from the current section by including more items, response options and guidelines, photographs, instruction videos, and Collaborative Action Points to alert caregivers when oral care is needed. This study describes and compares residents' oral health status assessed by caregivers using the current section and the OHS-interRAI.

methodsThis cross-sectional study includes baseline data of adults aged 65 years or older in Flemish and Dutch nursing homes, collected by professional caregivers (e.g., nurses, nurse aids, therapists). Assessments with the current section dated from October 2016 to January 2023, and with the OHS-interRAI from October 2020 to January 2023.

resultsInterRAI assessments of 12,476 residents from 158 nursing homes with the current section were compared with those of 1212 residents from 37 nursing homes with the OHS-interRAI. The OHS-interRAI assessments showed more missing data. A higher proportion of oral health problems was detected with the OHS-interRAI compared to the current section for chewing function (13.7% vs. 6.8%), dry mouth (9.8% vs. 7.6%), teeth (22.1% vs. 16.6% ),and gums (7.8% vs. 3.1%). There was no significant difference in the proportion of residents with discomfort or pain in the mouth.

conclusionsMore missing OHS-interRAI data may be attributed to regulatory decisions on using the interRAI LTCF instrument. Caregivers identified more oral health problems with the OHS-interRAI, which may be due to its additional features, such as photographs and extensive instructions. The Collaborative Action Points included in the OHS-interRAI support continuity of care and enable integration of oral care into general care. Further research is needed to evaluate whether the OHS-interRAI accurately identifies residents who need help with daily oral hygiene or dental referral.

Indexed as

Nursing HomesOral HealthAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth StatusHomes for the AgedHumansMaleOral HygieneAdvanced care planningAssessmentCare coordinationContinuum of CareGeriatric conditionsInterventionLong-term careOral careOral healthPerson-centered carePreventive medicine/ care/ servicesSuccessful aging

Identifiers

PMID39548377
PMCPMC11566277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.