Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39548283›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2025

Chromothripsis in cancer.

Milena Simovic-Lorenz, Aurélie Ernst

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Chromosomal Instability Drives Glioblastoma Heterogeneity and Therapeutic Opportunities.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Profiling Extrachromosomal Circular DNA (ecDNA) in CancerAnti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Chromothripsis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  20. Chromoanagenesis and Beyond: Catastrophic Events Shaping the Genome.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Milena Simovic-LorenzGroup Genome Instability in Tumors, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8835-6885
Aurélie ErnstGroup Genome Instability in Tumors, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany. a.ernst@dkfz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8082-3677

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromothripsis is a mutational phenomenon in which a single catastrophic event generates extensive rearrangements of one or a few chromosomes. This extreme form of genome instability has been detected in 30-50% of cancers. Studies conducted in the past few years have uncovered insights into how chromothripsis arises and deciphered some of the cellular and molecular consequences of chromosome shattering. This Review discusses the defining features of chromothripsis and describes its prevalence across different cancer types as indicated by the manifestations of chromothripsis detected in human cancer samples. The different mechanistic models of chromothripsis, derived from in vitro systems that enable causal inference through experimental manipulation, are discussed in detail. The contribution of chromothripsis to cancer development, the selective advantages that cancer cells might gain from chromothripsis, the evolutionary trajectories of chromothriptic tumours, and the potential vulnerabilities and therapeutic opportunities presented by chromothriptic cells are also highlighted.

Indexed as

ChromothripsisNeoplasmsAnimalsGenomic InstabilityHumansMutation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.