ArticleCommunications biology2024
Rapid and objective assessment of auditory temporal processing using dynamic amplitude-modulated stimuli.
Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Degraded neural coding of temporal fine structure with age predicts effortful listening in multi-talker environments.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Sound Advice: A Consumer's Perspective on Navigating the World of Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids.Seminars in hearing · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current tests of hearing fail to diagnose pathologies in ~10% of patients seeking help for hearing difficulties. Neural ensemble responses to perceptually relevant cues in the amplitude envelope, termed envelope following responses (EFR), hold promise as an objective diagnostic tool to probe these 'hidden' hearing difficulties. But clinical translation is impeded by current measurement approaches involving static amplitude modulated (AM) tones, which are time-consuming and lack optimal spectrotemporal resolution. Here we develop a framework to rapidly measure EFRs using dynamically varying AMs combined with spectrally specific analyses. These analyses offer 5x improvement in time and 30x improvement in spectrotemporal resolution, and more generally, are optimal for analyzing time-varying signals with known spectral trajectories of interest. We validate this approach across several mammalian species, including humans, and demonstrate robust responses that are highly correlated with traditional static EFRs. Our analytic technique facilitates rapid and objective neural assessment of temporal processing throughout the brain that can be applied to track auditory neurodegeneration using EFRs, as well as tracking recovery after therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.