ArticleScientific reports2024
Biocompatible nanocomposite hydroxyapatite-based granules with increased specific surface area and bioresorbability for bone regenerative medicine applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction and Properties of SPI/PLA-PCL Composite Coating on Pure Titanium Surface.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Biomedical potential of bovine-derived hydroxyapatite: synthesis strategies, characterization and applications.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Hydroxyapatite-Polysaccharide Composites Synthesized from Maize Lime-Cooking Wastewater for Bone Tissue Engineering.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Nanoparticle-Enabled Modulation of the Bone Immune Microenvironment for Enhanced Regeneration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Synergistic antioxidant and anti-inflammatory scaffold based on ascorbic acid-enriched hydroxyapatite-PEG-ZnO composite from natural bone waste.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Article
- The role of bioactive molecules in enhancing bone healing in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a review of current approaches and future directions.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Review
- Eggshell waste derived nano-hydroxyapatite/metakaolin composites for bone scaffold applications.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Next-generation craniomaxillofacial implants for reconstructive surgery: balancing biomechanics, biocompatibility, and bioactivity.International journal of oral science · 2026Review
- Advanced Strategies in the Repair of Alveolar Cleft Defects: Biological Approaches, Biomaterials, and Future Perspectives.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2026Review
- Comparative in vitro Study on Immunomodulatory Effects of Nano-Hydroxpatite Powders on Human Immune Cells.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Article
- Topography-based implants for bone regeneration: Design, biological mechanism, and therapeutics.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hydroxyapatite (HA) granules are frequently used in orthopedics and maxillofacial surgeries to fill bone defects and stimulate the regeneration process. Optimal HA granules should have high biocompatibility, high microporosity and/or mesoporosity, and high specific surface area (SSA), which are essential for their bioabsorbability, high bioactivity (ability to form apatite layer on their surfaces) and good osseointegration with the host tissue. Commercially available HA granules that are sintered at high temperatures (≥ 900 °C) are biocompatible but show low porosity and SSA (2-5 m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.