ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2025
Trials and tribulations of cell therapy for heart failure: an update on ongoing trials.
Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intramyocardial injection of allogeneic human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes in advanced ischemic heart failure: an early-stage randomized trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Changes in Circulating Biomarkers in Patients With Ischemic Heart Failure After Treatment With Autologous Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and c-Kit-Positive Cardiac Cells, Alone or in Combination: Results From the Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network CONCERT-HF Clinical Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Trial
- Harnessing Endogenous Plasticity Rather than Reprogramming of Mature Cells Will Advance Regenerative Medicine, Cancer Treatment and Rejuvenation.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- AT1R-mediated NIR-II/PA imaging-guided iCM exosome therapy for myocardial ischemia revascularization.Science advances · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular research in China: pathways, incentives and editorial implications.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Article
- Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Therapy in Cardiovascular Disease: Reconsidering Clinical Inconsistency Through the Mechanism-Endpoint Relationship.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Promising results with stem-cell-derived tissue transplantation in heart failure.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Article
- Stem cell-based regenerative therapies for non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: mechanistic insights, clinical evidence, and future directions.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Electrical coupling between transplanted cardiomyocytes and host myocardium to prevent arrhythmia.Disease models & mechanisms · 2026Review
- Past, Present and Future of Regenerative Gene Therapy for Ischemic Heart Failure.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Review
- Avenues for optimization of cardiac therapeutics by minimally invasive delivery.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Review
- Minimally invasive delivery of engineered heart tissues restores cardiac function in rats with chronic myocardial infarction.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Article
- Continuous electrocardiogram monitoring in porcine model of myocardial ischemia reperfusion.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Immunomodulatory effect of mesenchymal stromal cell overexpressing HLA-G1 in cell-based therapy for myocardial infarction.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Article
- Integrating Traditional Wisdom With Modern Science: Ginsenosides as Antiheart Failure Agents.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2026Review
- Recent advances in percutaneous coronary intervention for modernizing coronary physiology-guided and device-based strategies for coronary revascularization.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Editorial: Bioengineering and biotechnology approaches in cardiovascular sciences, volume III.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Comparative Effects of Repeated Intravenous Infusions of Progenitor Cells in a Rat Model of Chronic Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Article
- Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes improve recovery from myocardial infarction in non-human primates.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Heart-derived endogenous stem cells.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) remains a leading cause of mortality, responsible for 13% of all deaths worldwide. The prognosis for patients with HF is poor, with only a 50% survival rate within 5 years. A major challenge of ischaemia-driven HF is the loss of cardiomyocytes, compounded by the minimal regenerative capacity of the adult heart. To date, replacement of irreversibly damaged heart muscle can only be achieved by complete heart transplantation. In the past 20 years, cell therapy has emerged and evolved as a promising avenue for cardiac repair and regeneration. During this time, cell therapy for HF has encountered substantial barriers in both preclinical studies and clinical trials but the field continues to progress and evolve from lessons learned from such research. In this Review, we provide an overview of ongoing trials of cell-based and cell product-based therapies for the treatment of HF. Findings from these trials will facilitate the clinical translation of cardiac regenerative and reparative therapies not only by evaluating the safety and efficacy of specific cell-based therapeutics but also by establishing the feasibility of novel or underexplored treatment protocols such as repeated intravenous dosing, personalized patient selection based on pharmacogenomics, systemic versus intramural cell delivery, and epicardial engraftment of engineered tissue products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39548233What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.