ArticleScientific reports2024
Grey preferences selection index with trimmed group preference for evaluating university dormitory renovation design.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Renovating old buildings is a strategic approach to resource optimization and sustainability. However, dormitory design decisions are often made by a limited panel of experts, which risks excluding student preferences-key to the design process. Expert assumptions about student needs can lead to biased outcomes, and attempts to gather student input may suffer from respondent bias and inconsistent engagement, introducing data noise. This paper presents the Grey Trimmed Preferences Selection Index (GTPSI) Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method, an improved preference selection index MCDM method that integrates expert weights and refines student feedback by filtering outliers, using interval grey numbers to address uncertainty. Applied to dormitory renovation proposals, GTPSI provides a stable ranking framework, as confirmed by whitening sensitivity analysis, ensuring consistency across grey bounds. To further validate the selected alternative, results are cross-verified with TOPSIS and ELECTRE-III, reinforcing GTPSI's robustness in aligning renovation designs with actual student needs. The GTPSI method thus offers a comprehensive solution for integrating user-centered preferences into expert evaluations, promoting designs that better meet stakeholder expectations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.