ArticleScientific reports2024
Deep active learning for multi label text classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Weakly supervised text classification on free-text comments in patient-reported outcome measures.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Given a set of labels, multi-label text classification (MLTC) aims to assign multiple relevant labels for a text. Recently, deep learning models get inspiring results in MLTC. Training a high-quality deep MLTC model typically demands large-scale labeled data. And comparing with annotations for single-label data samples, annotations for multi-label samples are typically more time-consuming and expensive. Active learning can enable a classification model to achieve optimal prediction performance using fewer labeled samples. Although active learning has been considered for deep learning models, there are few studies on active learning for deep multi-label classification models. In this work, for the deep MLTC model, we propose a deep Active Learning method based on Bayesian deep learning and Expected confidence (BEAL). It adopts Bayesian deep learning to derive the deep model's posterior predictive distribution and defines a new expected confidence-based acquisition function to select uncertain samples for deep MLTC model training. Moreover, we perform experiments with a BERT-based MLTC model, where BERT can achieve satisfactory performance by fine-tuning in various classification tasks. The results on benchmark datasets demonstrate that BEAL enables more efficient model training, allowing the deep model to achieve training convergence with fewer labeled samples.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.